Hello,
I'm trying to wrap my head around a some offers from different IPSs. This
stuff (running BGP on internet routers) really is (currently) a bit over my
head, but I just can't bring me to accept the hardware requirements.
What we need to achieve basically is full redundancy on our internet
con
Hi,
Just a few thoughts:
1. You can use something small like a 1720 to run BGP but the trick here is
to filter all/some routes that you are receiving. The current recommendation
from Cisco is 128MB for full BGP routing tables (I think the tables stand on
110 000 routes now). The second part would
At 07:50 PM 6/20/2003 +, - jvd wrote:
>2. If you want to run full BGP tables you will need a router with more punch
>than the 1720. I did a proposal once with a 2650XM and the 2691 is also a
>good option. Next in line would be your 3640. Of course all of these models
>will need at least 128MB D
Hi Zsombor,
The last time I checked BGP was a routing protocol, that means there is an
algorithm running that's calculating the best path to a destination. A bunch
of information is advertised to you and your router needs to decide which
routes to put in the routing table based on the information
At 08:35 PM 6/21/2003 +, - jvd wrote:
>Hi Zsombor,
>
>The last time I checked BGP was a routing protocol, that means there is an
>algorithm running that's calculating the best path to a destination. A bunch
>of information is advertised to you and your router needs to decide which
>routes to pu
A team of us have been drafting IETF documents for a generalized
approach to single-router BGP convergence. The terminology document
is about to go to the RFC editor after some final text formatting.
The methodology document has technically expired--the economy hit the
team, but we should be g
Thank you for your answer Howard. Unfortunately I don't have enough
experience to answer in such depth as you did but maybe one day I'll get
there. :-)
PS. Isn't it good to see that experts participate in this forum too?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71088&t=70
At 1:57 PM + 6/22/03, - jvd wrote:
>Thank you for your answer Howard. Unfortunately I don't have enough
>experience to answer in such depth as you did but maybe one day I'll get
>there. :-)
>
>PS. Isn't it good to see that experts participate in this forum too?
>
Ah, but you are missing some o
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BGP on 1720 ? [7:70960]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a few thoughts:
>
> 1. You can use something small like a 1720 to run BGP but the
> trick here is
> to filter all/some routes that you are receiving. The current
> recommenda
9 matches
Mail list logo
