CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread . .
Just out of curiosity. Any CCIE that does not use their CCIE number in their signature? Once again, there is no point that I am trying to show. I am just curious _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://w

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread nrf
Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain a cloaked identity. "". ."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Just out of curiosity. > > Any CCIE that does not use their CCIE number in their signature? > > Once again, there is no point that

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread Robert D. Cluett
.., what is your point? ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain a > cloaked identity. > > > "". ."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Just out of curiosity.

RE: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread Louie Belt
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of nrf Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203] Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain a cloaked identity. "". ."" wrote in message [EMAI

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread nrf
Was there a point in the original question? So why exactly does there have to be a point in my answer? ""Robert D. Cluett"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > .., what is your point? > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Y

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread Robert D. Cluett
To the original question. His name is ".." as listed. I guess it seemed as if that was directed towards you, but this was not the case. Sorry. ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Was there a point in the original question? So why exactly does there have > t

RE: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-30 Thread supernet
May be some CCIEs use others' numbers? Is that what you are trying to say? Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of . . Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE number [7:50203] Just out of curiosity.

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-31 Thread nrf
Ah, I see. No problem. ""Robert D. Cluett"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To the original question. His name is ".." as listed. I guess it seemed as > if that was directed towards you, but this was not the case. Sorry. > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-31 Thread . .
Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people with their email signature as John smith CCIE 1024 or something like that. Then I know immediately that that person (i know that 1024 belongs to the lab!) is a CCIE. However, would all CCIE include their "CCIE 1024" in

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-07-31 Thread Wow
way too hard to ignorewhat on earth does this have to do with preparing for certification exams?? maybe you can ask cisco directly. they probably have *exact* counts of who doesnt do something. probably an entire department dedicated to this full time as a matter of fact. and they probably

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-08-01 Thread Peter van Oene
What is the point of listing it? At 11:04 PM 7/31/2002 +, . . wrote: >Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people >with their email signature as >John smith >CCIE 1024 > >or something like that. Then I know immediately that that person (i know >that 1024 belongs

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-08-01 Thread MADMAN
FWIW I know off hand about 5 CCIE's that don't include their cert in their sig file. I have not asked them why, never really thought much about it. Dave ". ." wrote: > > Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people > with their email signature as > John smith >

RE: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-08-01 Thread Marko Milivojevic
Smith" is CCIE, though. I always thought that was the reason to include the number. Marko. > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: fimmtudagur, 1. agzst 2002. 13:58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:

RE: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-08-01 Thread Mike Bernico
M > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203] > > > FWIW I know off hand about 5 CCIE's that don't include their cert in > their sig file. I have not asked them why, never really thought much > about it. > > Dave > > ". ." w

Re: CCIE number [7:50203]

2002-08-02 Thread nrf
http://www.illinois.net > (217) 557-6555 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:58 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203] > > > > >