Hello,
I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store & Forward. My
question is: How do you decide with method to use?, in whch situation have
you change the switching method?.
Thanks
Alejandro Acosta
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48316&t=4831
Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store &
> Forward. My
> question is: How do you decide with method to use?, in whch
> situation have
> you change the switching method?.
>
> Thanks
>
> Alejandro Acosta
>
>
A lot of switches supp
MADMAN wrote:
>
> I seem to recall some Cisco switches that would perform
> cut-through
> switching until a configurable number of CRC's are detected and
> would
> switch to store-and-forward until errors cleared.
>
> Dave
Oh, that's right! I meant to mention that in the message. Some switc
I seem to recall some Cisco switches that would perform cut-through
switching until a configurable number of CRC's are detected and would
switch to store-and-forward until errors cleared.
Dave
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I understand t
: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
> Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store &
> > Forward. My
&
that 20% of those packets are illegal?
>
>Thanks
>
>Alejandro Acosta
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>To:
>Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:08 PM
>Subject: RE: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
>
>
> > Aleja
]
Subject: Re: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
Hello again,
Priscilla, you have said that an ethernet frame must be at least 64 bytes,
right?. I have just placed an sniffer on my LAN and I found over 3000 out of
15.000 packets. Does this mean that 20% of those packets are illegal?
Th
.I found over 3000 out of 15.000 packets that were less than 64 bytes
longer..
- Original Message -
From: "Alejandro Acosta Alamo"
To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
>
lla
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alejandro Acosta Alamo"
> To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" ;
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
>
>
> > Hello again,
> > Priscil
Message -
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
>
>
> > Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > I understand the diff
those packets are
> illegal?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Alejandro Acosta
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:08 PM
> > Subject: RE: Cut-through v
11 matches
Mail list logo
