DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Gayathri
Firstly, sorry for the repeated submission, I dont see my psoting under the main heading so I am forced to post it again.. here is my question... I have 2 DHCP servers and I have defined both the IP helper addressess in our routers Now, if a client quieries for an IP, which of the servers wil

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Larry Lamb
Everything I've found on Cisco tells me that multiple helper addresses are supported and I would have to assume that it's forwarding the packet to both helper address and is taking the response from the first machine to respond. Any chance you can define part of the scope on each server? This wou

RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread McCallum, Robert
o the server then come back. I have encountered a few gotchas doing this before. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Larry Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 February 2001 10:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated Everything I've foun

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Firstly, sorry for the repeated submission, I dont see my psoting under the >main heading so I am forced to post it again.. > >here is my question... > > I have 2 DHCP servers and I have defined both the IP helper addressess in >our routers > >Now, if a client quieries for an IP, which of the s

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread R. Scott Sutor
The problem you are having is due do DHCP functionality, not cisco/helper address related. The DHCP server which does not have a scope created on it is issuing a NACK for the IP request to the client. This is probably happening first because the NACKing server can tell that it is not configured

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Marty Adkins
Gayathri wrote: > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 10.X.X.X 255.255.0.0 > ip helper-address 10.X.1.X > ip helper-address 10.X.1.Y > > The main reason we have 2 DHCP servers is for redundancy. > With both servers in the same physical LAN, you have redundant servers but not redundant network

RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Mel Chandler PMI
, February 23, 2001 12:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated Firstly, sorry for the repeated submission, I dont see my psoting under the main heading so I am forced to post it again.. here is my question... I have 2 DHCP servers and I have defined both the IP

RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Mel Chandler PMI
, February 23, 2001 2:44 AM To: 'Larry Lamb'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated Quick and easy way to find out if the packet is reaching each segment is . On each interface i.e. interface where user is, interface where DHCP server is do... ip account

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread Gayathri
+I, MCSE, CCNA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Analyst > Information Services > PMI Delta Dental > (562) 467-6627 > > > > -Original Message- > From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:44 AM > To: 'Larry La

RE: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-24 Thread Jon Krabbenschmidt
t; > Hope this helps. > > -Original Message- > From: Larry Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 February 2001 10:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated > > > Everything I've found on Cisco tells me that multiple helper a

Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-25 Thread Gayathri
wonder if it will get the same > coverage as the MS vs Justice department?? :>) > > sorry.. could not help it. > > -Original Message- > From: Gayathri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 7:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: