Re: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
gt; interval. Let's > > > say > > > > that CIR is measured over a time interval T. > > > > > > > > The committed burst size (Bc) specifies a maximum amount > of > > > data that the > > > > provider will transmit over the time i

Re: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-10 Thread Gaz
> > frames at the Bc level. > > > > > > Beyond the Bc, the provider can also support an excess burst > > size (Be) > > that > > > specifies the maximum amount in excess of Bc that the network > > will attempt > > > to transfer under no

Re: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
y defining Be to anything other than 0 you are > > > allowing specific > > > instances where a burst larger than Bc will be allowed but > > > marked DE ... or > > > something like that but less jumbled that makes sense. I > > > understand the > > >

Re: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Gaz
e I > > understand the theory. > > Thanks for the link Mark ... the explanation in that document > > is a bit > > clearer than the one in the FRTS docs. > > > > Thanks again > > Scott > > > > > > -Original Message- > > F

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
ks for the link Mark ... the explanation in that document > is a bit > clearer than the one in the FRTS docs. > > Thanks again > Scott > > > -Original Message- > From: Turpin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:10 AM >

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Mark Palakovich
This is some information that I found that may help you... frame relay mincir The actual guaranteed rate obtained from service provider in bps. This value should be the minimum rate you should drop to in the event of congestion (dropping below this rate implies you are not getting the bandwidth

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR traffic shaping [7:51044] I am not clear on two of the settings when configuring a map-class. Frame-relay bc and be Are these values supplied by the carrier or a value that you can calculate yourself based on other parameters? TIA Scott Message Posted at: http://www

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC]
than the one in the FRTS docs. Thanks again Scott -Original Message- From: Turpin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:10 AM To: 'Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044] Scott, I'm sure

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Turpin, Mark
c values, but you're really better off leaving it to IOS to figure out. hth, -Mark -Original Message- From: Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR traffic shaping [7:51044] I am not clear on two of the se

RE: FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
/RAC] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FR traffic shaping [7:51044] I am not clear on two of the settings when configuring a map-class. Frame-relay bc and be Are these values supplied by the carrier or a value that you can calculate

FR traffic shaping [7:51044]

2002-08-09 Thread Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC]
I am not clear on two of the settings when configuring a map-class. Frame-relay bc and be Are these values supplied by the carrier or a value that you can calculate yourself based on other parameters? TIA Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51044&t=51044 ---