I can't believe that I just failed the CID by six questions. I did not fail
because I do not understand network design, I failed because the test was so
horribly written. The questions were not hard, they were vague. There were
several questions with typos and errors. This test was as bad a
This is
> simply the only way to go with the old Cisco tests. Knowing the material
> just isn't enough; you have to know the TEST.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 6:48 PM
> To: Hal White
> Cc: [E
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Hal White wrote:
> I can't believe that I just failed the CID by six questions. I did not fail
don't kick yourself too hard, its a pretty challenging test with a broad
range of material.
> because I do not understand network design, I failed because the test was so
> horr
Title: RE: Failed CID!
Agreed - IN SPADES!! I studied the subject material on the objectives list and still managed to fail a few times. Finally I gave up and read an actual study guide that helped word the information the way the test words it (Robert Padjen's CCDA Study Guide by
Go take the test again.
About the speeding ticket:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0873374657/102-7627391-6476915
"Hal White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I can't believe that I just failed the CID by six questions. I did not
fail
Hal,
Sorry to hear that. For what it's worth, I heard about those vague questions
too.
Hang in there!
hv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hal White
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failed CID
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Hal White
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 8:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Failed CID!
>
>
> I can't believe that I just failed the CID by six
> questions. I did not fail
> because I do n
Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token Ring, or ATM WAN
Switches in the CID Exam?
I was very disappointed in this exam, I've been reading this exam sucked. It
really sucked when almost 20% of the questions were SNA, 20% were Token
Ring I had a few ATM WAN Switches, but I
wrong, I will; one of us will win, but
both of us will profit.
- John Galt
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Moreau-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:22 PM
Subject: Failed CID (640-025)
> Can anyone tell me why I
Cisco is updating CID. You could take the new beta for a low cost of $25.
One has to believe that they improved the test and brought it into the
current millennium. (whether you believe we're in the new one yet or not)
More info here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/tes
When is the current CID set to retire?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:18 AM
To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; cisco
Subject: Re: Failed CID (640-025)
Cisco is updating CID. You could
nal Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:18 AM
>To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; cisco
>Subject: Re: Failed CID (640-025)
>
>
>Cisco is updating CID. You could take the new beta for a l
; don't hold your breath.
>
> Priscilla
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> >Priscilla Oppenheimer
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:18 AM
> >To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; cisco
> >Subject
The BPX not BGX switch has a 9.6 Gps backplane. Chapter 21 of the Cid
course. If you only read the Cisco press book you wouldn't see it. Its a
stratacom switch.
""Aaron Moreau-Cook"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone tell me why I n
Yes, the StrataCom materials are only found in the
Cisco course materials and the Sybex book. They are
not even in the objectives listing, which would seem
very unfair. Other than Rishard's correct indication
of the backplane I would only suggest assuming that
the 'best' / highest number that soun
Title: RE: Failed CID (640-025)
I've said this before, but I'll rant again: this exam sucks like a Hoover. It is, IMNSHO, not relevant to the real world. However, the certification is nice to have, and Robert Padjen's (Sybex) Cisco Internetwork Design is the best preparat
ssage -
From: "Aaron Moreau-Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 20 November, 2000 22:22
Subject: Failed CID (640-025)
> Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token Ring, or ATM
WAN
> Switches in t
Working for a service provider ATM is big.
and we still use mainframes for billing and the like.
but we don't do content.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Moreau-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:22 PM
Subject
a
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Moreau-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:22 PM
Subject: Failed CID (640-025)
> Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token Ring, or ATM
WAN
> Switch
To: cisco
Subject: Failed CID (640-025)
Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token Ring, or ATM WAN
Switches in the CID Exam?
I was very disappointed in this exam, I've been reading this exam sucked. It
really sucked when almost 20% of the questions were SNA, 20% were Token
R
Title: RE: Failed CID (640-025)
I thought the same about ccda
dUCK
- Original Message -
From:
Taylor, Don
To: 'Aaron Moreau-Cook' ; cisco
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:37
PM
Subject: RE: Failed CID
(640-025)
I've said this before
You'll likley fail again.
Lame or not, it's on the test, and you need to know it to pass.
Pat Bass
CCNP/CCDP
""Aaron Moreau-Cook"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone tell me why I need to care about SNA, IPX, Token Ring, or ATM
WAN
> S
]On Behalf Of
Donald B Johnson Jr
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 11:00 AM
To: Aaron Moreau-Cook; cisco
Subject: Re: Failed CID (640-025)
a
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Moreau-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7
23 matches
Mail list logo
