Re: Fast EtherChannel [7:40430]

2002-04-05 Thread MADMAN
I'm think you simply want a single port channel interface to which you tie your fastethernets to inter fa 0/0 channel-group 1 ! inter fa0/1 channel group 1 ! inter port-channel 1 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 You don't create multiple port channels, you connect multiple FE's to create a

Re: Fast EtherChannel [7:40430]

2002-04-04 Thread Tom Scott
David C Prall wrote: > The 2900XL does not support PAgP negotiation, so you have to configure the > channel as on. Related to this, can you refer me to an example at cisco.com that shows an FEC between a 2900 switch and 2600 router ("router-on-a-stick"). Suppose we had two vlans (10 and 20). I

RE: Fast EtherChannel [7:40430]

2002-04-03 Thread David C Prall
Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fast EtherChannel [7:40430] > > > Heres the senerio: > When configuring fast etherchannel between a Cat. 4000 and a Cat. > 2900 using > 2 links, we first plugged the links in and saw that STP disabled one of &g

Fast EtherChannel [7:40430]

2002-04-03 Thread James Hampton
Heres the senerio: When configuring fast etherchannel between a Cat. 4000 and a Cat. 2900 using 2 links, we first plugged the links in and saw that STP disabled one of them, then on the 4000 we set the two links as fast etherchannel with the set port channel commands. From the 4000 we varified tha