Sure but I don't think I would go and redistribute them. You may want
to consider setting up two HSRP groups. That way you could utilize both
routers and have redundancy between the two default routers.
A better understanding of your topology would be insightful.
Dave
Scott wrote:
Is
Is it possible to have 2 different routers in the same EIGRP AS each have a
different default route? Essentially, a router will send a packet to the
closest default route until 1 of those routes goes down, and then all will
use the workng route?
On Friday 11 January 2002 09:54 am, MADMAN
')
WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF
Network Systems Trainer
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
You are absolutely right, my friend. I bumped
Hello,
Is there a command to configure a default route for eigrp speaking routers.
The default-network command works for rip and igrp and the
defaul-information originate command works for ospf but I am unable to
inject a default route to an eigrp speaking router.
I tried default-information
EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You
first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then
add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your EIGRP config. I think you have to
'redistribute static' as well. It will not propogate a default as a result
of the
vermill
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:37:07 -0500
EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You
first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then
add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your
6 matches
Mail list logo
