I've read here a couple of times that PIX's don't route. Period. In light of
this I'm left a little confused as to a proposed network map I was given
recently.
The core layer router is a 3640 linking all of our branch offices together.
>From the 3640, there is an ethernet connection to a PIX 515R
helps,
Evan
-Original Message-
From: haroldnjoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewalls and VPNs
I've read here a couple of times that PIX's don't route. Period. In light of
this I'm left a little confused
dnjoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Firewalls and VPNs
>I've read here a couple of times that PIX's don't route. Period. In light
of
>this I'm left a lit
ay, February 16, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Firewalls and VPNs
>I've read here a couple of times that PIX's don't route. Period. In light
of
>this I'm left a little confused as to a proposed network map I was given
>recently.
>
>The core layer router is a 3640 linkin
PM
To: haroldnjoe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewalls and VPNs
I think this comes from the fact that cisco instructors in class say that
the Pix is not a router. I have heard this as well when I had the class.
I know the Pix is not a router, but does it route? Well, if making decisions
raffic it recieves
> what does it do?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: haroldnjoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:41 PM
> Subject: Firewalls and VPNs
>
an
>> someone else shed some
>> light as to why this is said. If it doesn't route
>> the traffic it recieves
>> what does it do?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: haroldnjoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Newsgroups: gro
> It routes traffic to the appropriate interface. Can
> >> someone else shed some
> >> light as to why this is said. If it doesn't route
> >> the traffic it recieves
> >> what does it do?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original
routes.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: Firewalls and VPNs
As someone said yesterday: The PIX will not route, period. It will NAT
(in
hen I would
>> >> argue it does route. It does not forward traffic
>> >> based on layer 2 info so
>> >> ..
>> >>
>> >> It routes traffic to the appropriate interface. Can
>> >> someone else shed some
>> >> light
>>> >> routing then I would
>>> >> argue it does route. It does not forward traffic
>>> >> based on layer 2 info so
>>> >> ..
>>> >>
>>> >> It routes traffic to the appropriate interface. Can
>>>
> >> It routes traffic to the appropriate interface. Can
> > >> someone else shed some
> > >> light as to why this is said. If it doesn't route
> > >> the traffic it recieves
> > >> what does it do?
> > >>
> >
traffic
> > >> based on layer 2 info so
> > >> ..
> > >>
> > >> It routes traffic to the appropriate interface. Can
> > >> someone else shed some
> > >> light as to why this is said. If it doesn't route
> > >&g
t;> Well, if making decisions
> > > >> about where to send traffic based on layer 3
> info is
> > > >> routing then I would
> > > >> argue it does route. It does not forward
> traffic
> > > >> based on layer 2 info so
> > > >
r, but does it
> route?
> > > >> Well, if making decisions
> > > >> about where to send traffic based on layer 3
> info is
> > > >> routing then I would
> > > >> argue it does route. It does not forward
> traffic
> > > >&
;>
> > > > >
> > > > >--- mtieast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >> I think this comes from the fact that cisco
> > > > >> instructors in class say that
> > > > >> the Pix is not a router. I have heard this as
r 3 info is
>> > >> routing then I would
>> > >> argue it does route. It does not forward traffic
>> > >> based on layer 2 info so
>> > >> ..
> > > >>
>> > >> It routes traffic to the appropriate interfac
17 matches
Mail list logo
