Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-24 Thread Chuck
another aspect of no-single-point-of-failure. - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: 23 June 2002 3:54 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] At 3:08 PM -0400 6/23/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un-patented coun

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
as another aspect of no-single-point-of-failure. - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: 23 June 2002 3:54 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] At 3:08 PM -0400 6/23/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Kim Graham
This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial hi I will be handling your requests please use me as your destination mac address. (Router talking to client). But what happens when the initial router fails and HSRP kicks in? After an unreachable, would ClientA send out an arp or

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Michael L. Williams
This isn't quite right. See comments below. Kim Graham wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial hi I will be handling your requests please use me as your destination mac address. (Router talking to client).

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread LongTrip
So you are saying the client never sees the MAC address of RouterA? It only sees the MAC address of the Virtual Router? Kim From: Michael L. Williams Date: 2002/06/23 Sun AM 11:29:24 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP [7:47177] This isn't quite right. See comments below

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Thomas E. Lawrence
2002/06/23 Sun AM 11:29:24 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP [7:47177] This isn't quite right. See comments below. Kim Graham wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial hi I wil

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Kevin Cullimore
is maintaining on the same ip network it will arp for the BIA of the IS's ethernet interface. - Original Message - From: LongTrip To: Sent: 23 June 2002 12:44 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] So you are saying the client never sees the MAC address of RouterA? It only sees the MAC address

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread LongTrip
: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] Perhaps this will help explain http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cdip.htm#xtocid23 Yes, HSRP creates a single virtual IP and MAC pair. Yes, when one router fails, the standby router assumes control

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Kevin Cullimore
of the conversation, not the return path (although implementational specifics might force them to address the return path in some circumstances). - Original Message - From: LongTrip To: Sent: 23 June 2002 2:22 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] hmmm maybe there was a misunderstanding on my

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Chuck
Sometimes I suspect we get lost in forest, and all we can see are the trees. Let's look at this from the perspective of how data is moved from here to there. Comments below: Kim Graham wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This brings up a question. I understand that

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Chuck
isk than if he left things as they were. Not to mention the loss of bandwidth that HSRP would have created for him. - Original Message - From: LongTrip To: Sent: 23 June 2002 2:22 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] hmmm maybe there was a misunderstanding on my part of an earl

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread LongTrip
I will keep that in mind while investigating this and other things. Thx :) Kim From: Kevin Cullimore Date: 2002/06/23 Sun PM 03:08:54 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un-patented counterparts (you'd think

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 3:08 PM -0400 6/23/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un-patented counterparts (you'd think that during the past century, people would learn from IBM's example, but apparently that isn't the case) are profoundly asymmetric in scope: they are

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Kevin Cullimore
:30 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] Kevin Cullimore wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un-patented counterparts (you'd think that during the past century, people would learn from IBM's example, but ap

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 10:19 AM 6/23/02, Kim Graham wrote: This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial hi I will be handling your requests please use me as your destination mac address. (Router talking to client). Well, there's not really an initial hi, although I like the literary sound of

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
is a good idea too.) Priscilla Kim From: Thomas E. Lawrence Date: 2002/06/23 Sun PM 01:08:17 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] Perhaps this will help explain http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cdip.htm

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Kevin Cullimore
directions may be treated differently) is quite welcome. Comments? - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: 23 June 2002 3:54 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] At 3:08 PM -0400 6/23/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: A useful notion to keep in mind is that hsrp and its un

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
often don't consider L2 failover techniques (e.g., UplinkFast and EtherChannel) with switches feeding the HSRP routers as another aspect of no-single-point-of-failure. - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: 23 June 2002 3:54 pm Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] At 3

Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-23 Thread LongTrip
Comments in line. From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Date: 2002/06/23 Sun PM 08:19:23 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177] At 02:22 PM 6/23/02, LongTrip wrote: hmmm maybe there was a misunderstanding on my part of an earlier post that mentioned The only time you see

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-22 Thread LongTrip
/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1214ea1/3550scg/swhsrp.htm It is configurable if you need to do so with the following command. standby [group-number] mac-address mac-address or standby use-bia Kim From: Tim Potier Date: 2002/06/22 Sat AM 12:17:36 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HSRP [7:47177

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 12:17 AM 6/22/02, Tim Potier wrote: Lets say I have HSRP configured on a series of routers... I know clients are sending packets to the MAC/IP of the well known virtual MAC with Cisco equipment. Assume the receiving station recieves the packet directly from the router participating in HSRP

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-22 Thread Michael L. Williams
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... At 12:17 AM 6/22/02, Tim Potier wrote: Lets say I have HSRP configured on a series of routers... I know clients are sending packets to the MAC/IP of the well known virtual MAC with Cisco equipment. Assume

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-22 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
There might be a Howard-inspired lesson in this. ;-) In the Control Plane, the host ARPs for its default gateway, which in this case is configured to be the HSRP virtual IP address of the routers. In the Management Plane, the routers talk amongst themselves to make sure that the virtual IP

Re: HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-22 Thread Tim Potier
Thank you all! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47225t=47177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

HSRP [7:47177]

2002-06-21 Thread Tim Potier
Lets say I have HSRP configured on a series of routers... I know clients are sending packets to the MAC/IP of the well known virtual MAC with Cisco equipment. Assume the receiving station recieves the packet directly from the router participating in HSRP with the highest priority... what is the