-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin WelchSent:
Friday, October 13, 2000 1:08 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: High Availability. (Maybe
OT)
I am trying to figure out how to impliment a
redundant network design. The problem
.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin WelchSent:
Friday, October 13, 2000 3:08 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: High Availability. (Maybe
OT)
I am trying to figure out how to impliment a
redundant network design. The problem
Message-
From:Kevin Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Sat, 14 Oct 2000 00:07:43 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
Actually Cisco has a Content Caching Switch (CSS Something for the model)
That is a very
- Original Message -
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Priscilla Oppenheimer wro
riginal Message -
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 1:54 PM
> Subject: Re: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
>
>
> > Who makes Layer 4 swi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
> Who makes Layer 4 switches such as what you're talking about, Brian? Sorry
> if it's a dumb question.
>
> I'm helping a customer who has a setup similar to what you de
Title: RE: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
Sorry to get off the Cisco subject..
If you are using the MS platform then you have 2 options; Microsoft Cluster Service (MCS) or Network Load Balancing Service (NLBS). MCS provides up to 4 nodes in a cluster with 1 or more shared disk
>Problem, maintaing the same layer 3 address accross both switches in the
>advent that one link should fail, the server maintains reachability
Similar problem, the Layer 2 adresses have to be the same as well, or it
will not respond until the Arp-Cache timer expires.
Sounds like you need a Har
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Who makes Layer 4 switches such as what you're talking about, Brian? Sorry
> if it's a dumb question.
Foundry Networks www.foundrynet.com we use the serverion line.
Alteon Networks www.alteon.com makes good ones too (acedirector line)
Cis
Who makes Layer 4 switches such as what you're talking about, Brian? Sorry
if it's a dumb question.
I'm helping a customer who has a setup similar to what you describe, I
think. The customer is reluctant (unable?) to give me all the details, even
though I'm helping him troubleshoot some proble
Engineering Services
Cox Communications
Cox Internet Services
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 9:31 AM
To: Kevin Welch
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: High Availability. (Maybe OT)
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Kevin Wel
>
> Problem, maintaing the same layer 3 address accross both switches in the advent that
>one link should fail, the server maintains reachability.
>
Solution, use an alteon switch or some other switch like it where the
public ip is 1, but there are several private ips with servers
attached. Th
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Kevin Welch wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to impliment a redundant network design.
> The problem I keep running into is the connection to the server. I
> can provide Access redundancy through the use of two switches. I can
> provide some level of server redundanc
I am trying to figure out how to impliment a
redundant network design. The problem I keep running into is the
connection to the server. I can provide Access redundancy through the use
of two switches. I can provide some level of server redundancy via the use
of 2 NICs or 2 Servers. The p
14 matches
Mail list logo
