Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

VoIP Guy wrote: If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any FRF.12 fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters are OK? I have a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. The TS statements both match on both ends. We have the same type of

Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

for the pix... any help much appreciated. thanks, Ciaron - Original Message - From: Paul Jin To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263] VoIP Guy wrote: If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any FRF.12

Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

Hi All, I am having issues with a remote router we turned up overseas.. The router is working fine and the local access circuit test from the local telco comes back clean but, I am getting ping times on a normal 100 byte packet of around 170ms - 220ms. Similar type of connections all fall

RE: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

Paul, I have a feeling that you might have tried the below, but just for a suggestion: Is the ping time always high, or does it vary depending on the time of the day? If it's the latter, it might be a congestion problem, and you can check for the presence of FECN's on the frame switch. This

RE: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

Hi Alex, This site has another router connection back to the hub so this PVC is not being used at this moment except for testing. I have no fecn/becns. I have the CIR set at 128K on the network portion. No discards within the cloud. in fact, within the network, it is around 70 ms between

Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]

If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any FRF.12 fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters are OK? I have a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. Paul Jin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Alex, This site has