Sorry Thomas the command is "sh mls en".
""Thomas N."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have any problem turning on VLAN interfaces that are running on NAT
> protocol? I couldn't turn VLAN on my 6509 that has "ip nat inside"
> statement. Thanks!
>
> Thomas
Sorry, the command is .
""Thomas N."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have any problem turning on VLAN interfaces that are running on NAT
> protocol? I couldn't turn VLAN on my 6509 that has "ip nat inside"
> statement. Thanks!
>
> Thomas N.
Message Po
You can go to the switch prompt to check MLS by using the command . There
are other options with this command.
""Thomas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am now very confused. On the 6509, if I put "show mls rp", it said MLSs
> was globally disable. When I turn
I am now very confused. On the 6509, if I put "show mls rp", it said MLSs
was globally disable. When I turned on MLS on both global and interface
mode (include vlans that have NAT), it took just fine. Now I issued "show
mls rp interfaces", VLANs with NAT didn't appear on the list of interfaces
I have never tried so I gave er a go and it took the command just
fine:
C6509> ses 16
Trying Router-16...
Connected to Router-16.
Escape character is '^]'.
User Access Verification
Password:
MSFC16>en
Password:
MSFC16#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
MSFC16
trick Ramsey"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multilayer Switching [7:24595]
>Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:56:41 -0500
>
>IF you have that vlan off then the ip nat inside statement is useless I
>would assume. If infact the ip nat inside statement is doign something, I
>would
Sorry all for the confusion. I mean I could not enable MLS on VLANs that
are running NAT. When I put "mls rp ip" on VLAN interfaces that have NAT
running, I didn't get any error message. However, when I did the "show mls
rp interfaces" I didn't see VLANs with NAT on the list of VLANs running
IF you have that vlan off then the ip nat inside statement is useless I
would assume. If infact the ip nat inside statement is doign something, I
would assume the vlan to be on...
Is this logic incorrect? OR do I not understand you question?
-Patrick
>>> "Thomas N." 10/29/01 08:45PM >>>
Anyo
did you enter into the MSFC session ?
""Thomas N."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have any problem turning on VLAN interfaces that are running on NAT
> protocol? I couldn't turn VLAN on my 6509 that has "ip nat inside"
> statement. Thanks!
>
> Thomas N
Anyone have any problem turning on VLAN interfaces that are running on NAT
protocol? I couldn't turn VLAN on my 6509 that has "ip nat inside"
statement. Thanks!
Thomas N.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24595&t=24595
-
10 matches
Mail list logo