Ramcharan
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Cisco Groupstudy. com Mailing list (E-mail)
Subject: Multiple T1's
To revisit this question from yesterday, could the following be done and
what does it accomplish, if anything?
The question posed is below.
"Jason Stephens" &l
I am doing exactly the same thing using MPPP and Virtual interfaces. Here's
how the config looks:
multilink virtual-template 1
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no ip mroute-cache
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no ip mr
second
line when usage on the primary line drops below the predefined load.
Any input would be appreciated. Thanks.
Vijay Ramcharan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
In this scenario, is it possible to use a "backup interface" command along
with "backup load" and "backup delay"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
At 02:12 PM 3/20/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>If you are running EIGRP as your routing protocol, it wi
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Brian
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Multiple T1's
>
>
>On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
>
> Bri
>"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PR
. If you want per packet load balancing, disable caching.
No multilink PPP required.
Bri
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Lemagie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple T1's
> If yo
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple T1's
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
Bri
"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]&qu
You may also find that you have turn off fast switching in order for the
load to be balanced packet by packet.
""Jason Stephens"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to a
more precisely, out both serial interfaces..
Brian
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998nrc$3h8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
>
> Bri
> "Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in mess
On each end, static route traffic out both interfaces.
Bri
"Jason Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:998ndv$1fh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to another office.
We
> want these 2 t1's to not
> o
We have a situation where we want to have 2 t1's going to another office. We
want these 2 t1's to not
only provide redundancy in case 1 goes down, but also want them to load
balance while they are both up.
So basically, we want the two t1's to be up providing 3 mpbs of bandwidth
and if one goes do
If they are equal cost, most any routing protocol can do this - RIP, EIGRP,
OSPF, etc.
One note on this though - If you are no process-switching, the load
balancing is done on a per-destination basis. Meaning all traffic for one
host is sent on first T1, all traffic for second host goes on se
Hi !!
I need to load balace four T1 circuits between point A and point B. The
router at point A is a 2621 with four T1 WIC cards and the router at point B
is a 7204 with 4 channelised T1 ports. I want to load balance the path
between point A and point B so that I get a single virtual pipe between
14 matches
Mail list logo
