If there weren't any bugs, it wouldn't be Cisco.
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I interpret the question to inquire if one should take Lab version 1.0
or wait for Lab version 1.01. There are bound to be bugs.
The_Jester 07/14/02 04:40PM
The
I personally had a Nov 4th lab date and was able to swap to a Oct 24th date
a couple of weeks ago. My thinking was that if they are getting rid of IPX
and token switch stuff(fairly easy), that content will be replaced by other
areas, not neccesarily the 3550 switch. I was totally geared up to
Jester-
I think this was a fair question. I'm not asking for details, strictly
opinions. Just what part of my post did you find to be 'cheating'?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48828t=48731
--
FAQ, list
The proctors have been saying it in all the Networkers CCIE powersessions.
Paul Jones wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Where did you hear that there were going to be two switches per rack? How
do you know you won't have to do any CatIOS?? Please enlighten
I interpret the question to inquire if one should take Lab version 1.0
or wait for Lab version 1.01. There are bound to be bugs.
The_Jester 07/14/02 04:40PM
The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not
so hard that one needs to cheat to pass.
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote
Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the NDA
before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the
certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science.
Gene Volpe wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have my lab
At 7:48 AM + 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote:
Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the NDA
before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the
certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science.
Years ago, I was teaching a networking seminar at
The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not
so hard that one needs to cheat to pass.
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 7:48 AM + 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote:
Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to
You should go ahead and take it on the Nov.5. Just make sure you spend some
time working on the 3550 EMI. There will be two of them in each pod and you
will have to route between VLANs. The good new is that you will not have to
do any CatIOS (simple but still).
Message Posted at:
Where did you hear that there were going to be two switches per rack? How
do you know you won't have to do any CatIOS?? Please enlighten me
ThanksThornton Hopkins wrote:
You should go ahead and take it on the Nov.5. Just make sure
you spend some time working on the 3550 EMI. There will
I have my lab scheduled for Nov. 5th. This is the first day that the lab
will go to the new format . I am curious as to what people would think if
they were scheduled for this date. Do you think it is dangerous and I
should move it, or it does not matter? Just wondereing if anyone had any
I suspect it is going to become VERY difficult to find open dates in the few
weeks prior to November 4, the day the new format becomes official. Unless
you want to travel to one of the lesser utilized labs in South America or
the Pacific region.
Best advice? Maybe delay your attempt, and see
Gene,
That would probably be a good question for you to ask the Cisco CCIE
collective team:
http://www.ccbootcamp.com/askcisco.asp
I'm sure they might be able to help provide some additional insite into what
will happen on Nov. 5th.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS / Security)
[EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo