RE: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-31 Thread Troy Leliard
Are both side of the link on sub interfaces? Do you have anything configure on the main interface or any unassigned DLCI's, which are automatically assigned to the default interface? With OSPF I tend to only inlcude networks to which the router is directly attached, so in your case, network x.x.x

Re: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-27 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""CiscoNewbie"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring up > an adjacency accross a P2P link. > > OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on the > same network my eperience is that you should

RE: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-27 Thread Troy Leliard
Are both side of the link on sub interfaces? Do you have anything configure on the main interface or any unassigned DLCI's, which are automatically assigned to the default interface? With OSPF I tend to only inlcude networks to which the router is directly attached, so in your case, network x.x.x

Re: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-26 Thread Murali Das
Hi, Probably I should have asked some more questions - Hello packet has the following important fields that should match on both routers trying to form adjacency - 1. Network Mask, 2. Hello Interval, 3. Options field 4. Router dead interval Make sure that the neighboring interfaces are of same netw

Re: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-26 Thread CiscoNewbie
Hi and thanks for your reply. I had already attempted what you suggested and still the adjacency does not come up. Can you (or any list member) clarify for me whether the network command along with the wildcard mask have to match exactly as the interface for which you are enabling OSPF is configur

Re: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-26 Thread Murali Das
CiscoNewbie wrote: Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring up an adjacency accross a P2P link. OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on the same network I am presuming that the issue here is the subnet mask that I have specified the

Re: OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-26 Thread Levent Ogut
network xxx.xxx.xxx.14 0.0.0.3 area 1 ""CiscoNewbie"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring up > an adjacency accross a P2P link. > > OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on the > same

OSPF Adjacency Question [7:66206]

2003-03-25 Thread CiscoNewbie
Hi all. my cisco router keeps reporting this error when trying to bring up an adjacency accross a P2P link. OSPF: Rcv pkt from xxx.xxx.xxx.13, Serial0/0.1, area 0.0.0.1: src not on the same network I am presuming that the issue here is the subnet mask that I have specified the network statement

Re: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-09 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Finally, I got it. The DR and BDR are per segment not per area. If an area >has several segments, it has several DRs and BDRs as well. > >Am I right? The OSPF terminology is confusing. It would have been better to call the DR and BDR "designated interface." You are correct thwt they are idea

Re: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-09 Thread Edward Moss
and the light goes on! You are correct. DR and BDR are per segment, not per area. Routers on the same segment become adjacent, not ever router in the same area. However each router in the same area will have the same database for the area. Ed ___ UPDATED Posti

Re: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-09 Thread Daniel Ma
Finally, I got it. The DR and BDR are per segment not per area. If an area has several segments, it has several DRs and BDRs as well. Am I right? Sorry for waisting your bandwidth. Daniel "Daniel Ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8hpgv2$r6s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8hpgv2$r6s$[EMAIL PRO

Re: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-08 Thread Daniel Ma
iginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Daniel Ma > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 9:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OSPF adjacency question > > > We all know that in an area (multi-access media), all routers must form >

RE: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-08 Thread Ryan Moffett
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Ma Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF adjacency question We all know that in an area (multi-access media), all routers must form adjacency with DR and BDR. But how it is done if the

Re: OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-08 Thread dward
OSPF Adjancencies are only formed between directly connected routers. In your example Router A and Router B would form an adjacency, then Router B and Router C will form a second adjacency. Darren On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Daniel Ma wrote: > We all know that in an area (multi-access media), all rout

OSPF adjacency question

2000-06-08 Thread Daniel Ma
We all know that in an area (multi-access media), all routers must form adjacency with DR and BDR. But how it is done if the router is not directly linked to DR? For example, Router A is the DR. Router B is between the Router A and Router C. Now Router C must form adjacency with Router A. Am I rig