RE: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-07-08 Thread Brian Lodwick
believe one of our best assetts. I would love to go back to being UUNET and not have anything to do with everything else that makes up WorldCom! >>>Brian >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Off T

RE: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-07-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng is no longer owned by WorldCom -kidding ;-) >>>Brian >From: "deltan" >Reply-To: "deltan" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505] >Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 03:48:57 GMT > >UUNet is a Cisco shop for sur

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-07-05 Thread Brian Lodwick
;-) >>>Brian >From: "deltan" >Reply-To: "deltan" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505] >Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 03:48:57 GMT > >UUNet is a Cisco shop for sure (Canada and US). > >And don't

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-07-03 Thread deltan
UUNet is a Cisco shop for sure (Canada and US). And don't confuse WCOM's data networking division with UUNet (WCOM's subsidiary in Internetworking). Those students might be talking about the data networking sidetrue or false, I don't know. -B :) --- Chuck wrote: > Not too long ago, John C

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread Rick
take > years to absorb. And as far as jobs and hiring out in the world, well who's > going to quit there job because they didn't get a raise lately?-" > > JMHO :-0 > > -Eric > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck" > To: > Sent: W

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread Eric Rogers
they didn't get a raise lately?-" JMHO :-0 -Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:31 PM Subject: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505] > So far today I have seen no word from Cisco on its exposure to World Com. &g

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread John Kaberna
The Cisco guys are saying that UUNet converted a lot of stuff to Juniper and a few other vendors. ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Not too long ago, John Chambers was quoted in one of the networking > magazines talking about erosion of margins, and partn

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread Chuck
Not too long ago, John Chambers was quoted in one of the networking magazines talking about erosion of margins, and partners who sold very cheaply. The talk on the street was that it was no secret he was talking about WorldCom, who have been notorious for their pricing of Cisco products as an indu

Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread John Kaberna
Talking with a couple of my students (employees at Cisco) WCOM is mostly a Nortel shop. They said that ATT and Sprint are Cisco Powered Networks so they are the big providers that Cisco is interested in. This is not official or anything from Cisco it's just what these guys are telling me. ""Ch

Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]

2002-06-26 Thread Chuck
So far today I have seen no word from Cisco on its exposure to World Com. the other so called players in the networking industry - Redback, Nortel, and Lucent, have all said they have very little on the line with WorldCom. Of course, these are companies with one foot in the grave already. WorldC