sgroups: groupstudy.cisco
Sent: Tuesday, 04 June, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Policy routing - directly connected interfaces [7:45628]
> You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
> by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined
for
> a
You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined for
a remote desination that is directly connected or via a next hop would be
routed and subject to your policy. This is strange.
Ip local policy will
ut page 819 of Doyle Vol 1. "ip local policy route-map"
> HTH
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 12:36 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Policy routing - directly connected inter
Check out page 819 of Doyle Vol 1. "ip local policy route-map"
HTH
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Policy routing - directly connected interfaces [7:45628]
Continued policy routing testing of a customer network simulation in my lab
has revealed something of interest to me. Can't find a revelation in the
config and command references on CCO.
I have a policy set up such that packets with a particular source address
and a particular destination address
5 matches
Mail list logo
