Re: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-28 Thread Christopher Larson
ginal Message - From: "Mooney Drew-DMOONEY1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Marc Quibell'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Drew Mooney-DMOONEY1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 9:20 PM Subject: RE: CCDA quest

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Brian
126 > 408-525-0873 [office] 408-287-3188 [home] > 817-937-7880 [mobile] 888-809-9678 [SkyTel Pager] > +44-(0)7715-055-944 UK Mobile > > > -Original Message- > From: Marc Quibell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:49

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Mooney Drew-DMOONEY1
-Original Message- From: Marc Quibell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 5:41 PM To: Drew Mooney-DMOONEY1; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA question-512 bit times The ideal network is a completely switched network, no hubs. No collisions in full-duplex mode

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Marc Quibell
nvisix -- Motorola and Cisco Together >1334-394 The Alameda // San Jose, CA 95126 >408-525-0873 [office] 408-287-3188 [home] >817-937-7880 [mobile] 888-809-9678 [SkyTel Pager] >+44-(0)7715-055-944 UK Mobile > > >-----Original Message- >From: Marc Quibell

Re: CCDA question-512 bit times (simple) ;)

2000-07-27 Thread NeoLink2000
In a message dated 27.07.00 19:34:37 Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << You and others in this thread seem to be saying that incorporating switches into a network is to completely eliminate collisions. True? False? Please clear this up for methanks. >> It's not that s

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Mooney Drew-DMOONEY1
817-937-7880 [mobile] 888-809-9678 [SkyTel Pager] +44-(0)7715-055-944 UK Mobile -Original Message- From: Marc Quibell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:49 PM To: Drew Mooney-DMOONEY1 Subject: RE: CCDA question-512 bit times I agree. Once you get out of the

Re: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Marc Quibell
I think she answers in her book, in a roundabout way, that in FULL-DUPLEX mode, collisions are non-existant, since two stations can transmit at the same time on the wire (a switch and the PC or device on it's port, transmitting and receiving at the same time) Marc "Steve Brokaw" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread William Swedberg
Even though you are in a switched enviroment, if you are running HALF duplex you will still encounter collisions. --- Steve Brokaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I have a different question that kinda goes > along here. If you are in a switched environment, > i.e. dedicated bandwidth pe

Re: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread UFUK YASIBEYLI
Hello, Be carefull with collision domain and broadcast domain definitions. You might indeed have a single broadcast domain including multiple collision domains. (Especially with switched ethernet segments.) Each ethernet switch port is a seperate collision domain, either UTP or fiber. Howeve

Re: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Michael Fountain
Fibre doesn't actually break the 512 bit-time rule. You still need to keep your network under 512 bit-times from worst-case station to station. Fibre can have the longer lengths because it doesn't sucumb to attenuation as fast as copper. The differences in propegation time between copper and

RE: CCDA question-512 bit times

2000-07-27 Thread Steve Brokaw
Well, I have a different question that kinda goes along here. If you are in a switched environment, i.e. dedicated bandwidth per port, how can you have a collision at all? To me it seems (and Radia Perlmann touches on this in her book but doesn't give any explanation) that if there is no chan