Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain a
cloaked identity.
"". ."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just out of curiosity.
>
> Any CCIE that does not use their CCIE number in their signature?
>
> Once again, there is no point that
.., what is your point?
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain a
> cloaked identity.
>
>
> "". ."" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Just out of curiosity.
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
nrf
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203]
Yes, suffice it to say that there are some CCIE's that like to maintain
a
cloaked identity.
"". ."" wrote in message
[EMAI
Was there a point in the original question? So why exactly does there have
to be a point in my answer?
""Robert D. Cluett"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> .., what is your point?
>
> ""nrf"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Y
To the original question. His name is ".." as listed. I guess it seemed as
if that was directed towards you, but this was not the case. Sorry.
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Was there a point in the original question? So why exactly does there
have
> t
May be some CCIEs use others' numbers? Is that what you are trying to
say?
Yoshi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
. .
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE number [7:50203]
Just out of curiosity.
Any C
Ah, I see. No problem.
""Robert D. Cluett"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> To the original question. His name is ".." as listed. I guess it seemed
as
> if that was directed towards you, but this was not the case. Sorry.
>
> ""nrf"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL
Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people
with their email signature as
John smith
CCIE 1024
or something like that. Then I know immediately that that person (i know
that 1024 belongs to the lab!) is a CCIE.
However, would all CCIE include their "CCIE 1024" in
way too hard to ignorewhat on earth does this have to do with preparing
for certification exams??
maybe you can ask cisco directly. they probably have *exact* counts of who
doesnt do something. probably an entire department dedicated to this full
time as a matter of fact. and they probably
What is the point of listing it?
At 11:04 PM 7/31/2002 +, . . wrote:
>Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people
>with their email signature as
>John smith
>CCIE 1024
>
>or something like that. Then I know immediately that that person (i know
>that 1024 belongs
FWIW I know off hand about 5 CCIE's that don't include their cert in
their sig file. I have not asked them why, never really thought much
about it.
Dave
". ." wrote:
>
> Ok, may be i should rephase my question again. I have seen a lot of people
> with their email signature as
> John smith
>
Smith" is CCIE, though.
I always thought that was the reason to include the number.
Marko.
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: fimmtudagur, 1. agzst 2002. 13:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203]
>
>
> FWIW I know off hand about 5 CCIE's that don't include their cert in
> their sig file. I have not asked them why, never really thought much
> about it.
>
> Dave
>
> ". ." w
http://www.illinois.net
> (217) 557-6555
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:58 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: CCIE number [7:50203]
> >
> >
>
14 matches
Mail list logo