RE: Can someone interpret this please? - an Update

2001-02-26 Thread Maness, Drew
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can someone interpret this please? - an Update Hi All, When they refer to long they often mean 'real long'. I once looked at a faulty LAN in this case the servers were falling of the end. They got smmart moved the servers out of the computer room and into

Re: Can someone interpret this please? - an Update

2001-02-26 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi All, When they refer to long they often mean 'real long'. I once looked at a faulty LAN in this case the servers were falling of the end. They got smmart moved the servers out of the computer room and into the middle of the physical LAN this helped slightly. Eventually the rang me and I

Re: Can someone interpret this please? - an Update

2001-02-26 Thread John Neiberger
I don't remember this thread, but I wanted to chime in. This one time (at band camp) we had a file server connected to a hub, but someone set the server to full duplex. This was wreaking all sorts of havoc on the LAN. I noticed the large number of late collisions but I didn't know what that ind

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread Raj Singh
Kevin and John, A note about the "memory access errors". If the router in question is using a MIPS CPU for example, interrupt processing CPU utlization can also run higher than normal due to an error called an alignment error. Alignment errors occur when the program running on the CPU attempts t

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread John Neiberger
the low level of traffic, what else could be keeping the cpu > utilization up so high? Need more info. let me know! > > Kevin Wigle > > > - Original Message - > From: "Phillip Heller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EM

RE: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread Bob Johnson
As far as I understand... (standard disclaimer) The first number is the total CPU utilization... The second number (after the /) is the total utilization that is being used for interrupts. The difference between these 2 numbers is the amount the router uses for the processes listed below the line

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread Kevin Wigle
t;Phillip Heller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Can someone interpret this please? > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: > > D

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread John Neiberger
The CPU is being chewed up by fast switching, which doesn't show up in the output except for five-second utilization. The percentage after the "/" shows interrupt-level CPU usage. I had a similar problem when we were migrating from Netware 4 to Netware 5. A couple of different times we cre

Re: Can someone interpret this please?

2001-02-12 Thread Phillip Heller
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: Dear group, Investigating a router that is starting to loaded down. When I do a sh proc cpu I get 50% or cpu utilization but the stats don't seem to add up to 50%. Is there another way to try and see where the 50% is coming from? sh