If you have redundant 6509 chassis with a sup in each, a 2nd sup in each one
is not necessary. Its nice to have, but an added expense.
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sen
Good point.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you have redundant 6509 chassis with a sup in each, a 2nd sup in each
one
> is not necessary. Its nice to have, but an added expense.
>
traffic.
>From: "Larry Letterman"
>Reply-To: "Larry Letterman"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Core layer question [7:40535]
>Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:53:02 -0500
>
>If you have redundant 6509 chassis with a sup in each, a 2nd sup in each
>one
Yes you are correct. I have a customer though, a big hospital where there
is no such
thing as downtime. They have dual 6509's with dual sups and MSFC's simply
beacause some
servers have only a single connection. The sales guy was happy!!
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
> If you have redundant
It's not a bad idea to have an IDS blade in the core, but if you have to
pick either the DMZ and server blocks or the core, I would choose the
former. Having an IDS blade in the core should not affect any other
processing of the switch since its a completely self contained module with
its own pro
I've always understood that anything in the core (access-lists, FW blades,
IDS modules, etc. ) is a bad design as it just slows down traffic as the
core is built for speed. I was always told to move everything to the distro
or access-layer, depending on the function, AFAIK, the IDS blades have t
Do y'all know about Cisco's SAFE design? It's a "blueprint" for
implementing security on enterprise networks, sort of a template for a
typical enterprise network (if there is such a thing as typical). It would
probably give you ideas on where Cisco would put the IDS.
It was developed by Sean C
I had classes at Cisco on SAFE (EXCELLENT STUFF IF ANYONE GET'S TO GO!!) ,
and the Cisco rep said the same thing - never put anything in core. If you
look at the SAFE blueprint for Enterprises, the IDS aren't in the core
either (I checked last week).
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Core layer question [7:40535]
I've always understood that anything in the core (access-lists, FW blades,
IDS modules, etc.
9 matches
Mail list logo
