. Don't have access to internet / documentation
right now but it would be done under each 'interface' ie. Fastethernet 0/2
etc
Thanks
Manish
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dual Link redundancy [7
Link redundancy [7:47854]
Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links
will
pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other.
Cisco Example:
set trunk 1/1 dot1q on
set trunk 1/2 dot1q on
set port channel 1/1-2 on
Message Posted at:
http
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
Can't I use the port group 1 distribution destination on both switches ???
I tried using set trunk ... but the switch did'nt understand the command ...
the switch is running Version
Off of the top of my head, I'd say something like this:
interface FastEthernet 0/1
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface FastEthernet 0/2
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface Port-Channel 1
HTH,
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links will
pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other.
Cisco Example:
set trunk 1/1 dot1q on
set trunk 1/2 dot1q on
set port channel 1/1-2 on
Message Posted at:
Check out Fast Etherchannel
(watch for wrapping)
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fe
tec_wp.htm
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dual Link redundancy
Do we need to setup trunks if we have default VLAN1 running only .
-Original Message-
From: Chris Harshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2002 6:59 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
Configure both links as trunks then form
]
Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
Do we need to setup trunks if we have default VLAN1 running only .
-Original Message-
From: Chris Harshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2002 6:59 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7
No... you don't. You can simply configure an Etherchanell that only carries
VLAN1 only if you want more than 1 VLAN on the switches to you need a
trunk.
Mike W.
Kohli, Jaspreet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Do we need to setup trunks if we have default
Huh? Why would you need VLAN trunking to utilize Etherchannel? They're two
independant technologies (that can be combined if you wish). We have
Etherchannel configured between many switches that aren't trunk links (i.e.
only carrying VLAN1). (and it would also be a pain to configure an
10 matches
Mail list logo