>Hey Group,
> I recently pondered something while at work and nobody could give me a
>strait answer. Actually I feel a little embarrassed asking this due to me
>being an NP and I feel like I should know this. Guess this type of thing
>doesn't come up much around me. Question is: Can poison rev
t;To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse...
>Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:44:28 -0700
>
>Judging by the web page on Cisco's site
>(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/knowledge/wan/subi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse...
>
>
> Leigh Anne Chisholm,
> Actually by default on IP interfaces:
> Split-horizon is disabled on Frame-relay physical interfaces
> Split-horizon is enabled on Frame-relay point-to-point and multipoint
>
th the hub as a multipoint
subinterface to control traffic, such as for filtering or traffic shaping.
>>>Brian
>From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ci
is ENABLED but isn't much of
an issue since it's a point-to-point link.
-- Leigh Anne
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Lodwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 27, 2001 11:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse
because in this
environment direct access is not provided for DR/adjacencies to occur.
>>>Brian
>From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Leigh Anne Chisholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTE
g to the same network number (100). Site E has migrated
>off of the multipoint network to its own point-to-point
>subinterface network (200). Eventually, all remote sites can be moved to
>their own point-to-point subinterface networks and the
>multipoint subinterface will not be necessa
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brian Lodwick
> Sent: February 27, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse...
>
>
> OSPF uses split-horizon? I don't think this is correct. I hate to be quick
> to reply but there is
caused by the way Distance-vector protocols converge.
>>>Brian
>From: "Maness, Drew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Maness, Drew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Z'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[E
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Z'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse...
>Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:36:57 -0800
>
>OSPF does use Split horizon. I don't think OSPF use
an; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FR + Poison Reverse...
But I thought that I'd seen or heard of using split horizon with
OSPF...maybe I'm thinking of Frame Relay...long day I guess...
This has been an Eyez Only streaming e-ma
CCNP, CCDA
- Original Message -
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: FR + Poison Reverse...
>
>
> split horizon and PR are both associated with d
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:23 AM
Subject: RE: FR + Poison Reverse...
> Split Horizon and Poison Reverse are Distance Vector Routing Protocols.
OSPF
> is a Link-State Routing Protocol, meaning it builds a complete pic
split horizon and PR are both associated with distance vector protocols,
OSPF is a link state protocol.
Brian
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Z wrote:
> Hey Group,
> I recently pondered something while at work and nobody could give me a
> strait answer. Actually I feel a little embarrassed asking thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
