Re: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-10-16 Thread J.D. Chaiken
An FXS port connects to a phone at a WorkStation, whereas the FXO connects to the Phone Companies (or your PBX) Central Office. ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Feb 17, 12:53pm, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote: > } Haakon Claas

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Feb 17, 12:53pm, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote: } Haakon Claassen (hclaasse) wrote: } > } > FXS is a station (end device) } } FXS connects an end device, such as a telephone. It isn't an end device } itself. An FXS port is a port which connects to a Station device. } > FXO is a trunk

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Feb 17, 1:06pm, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote: } John Neiberger wrote: } > } > A phone, as an end-user device, is a station and hence an FXS } > device. } > This connects to an FXO port on the router? } } No, that's backwards. A phone connects to an FXS port on a router. I Correct. }

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Feb 17, 12:55pm, "John Neiberger" wrote: } } Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I thought it Yeah, it was. } was at one time but later I thought I had it backwards. Now I think I'm } just really confused! Let me see if I have this right: The ports are named

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread John Neiberger
Thanks, I was just trying to clarify. It seemed like there was a lot of confusion, especially on my side! John >>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 9/27/02 12:30:21 PM >>> John Neiberger wrote: > > Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I > thought it > was at one time but later I t

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
John Neiberger wrote: > > Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I > thought it > was at one time but later I thought I had it backwards. Now I > think I'm > just really confused! Let me see if I have this right: > > A phone, as an end-user device, is a station and hence an

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread John Neiberger
Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I thought it was at one time but later I thought I had it backwards. Now I think I'm just really confused! Let me see if I have this right: A phone, as an end-user device, is a station and hence an FXS device. This connects to an FXO po

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Haakon Claassen (hclaasse) wrote: > > FXS is a station (end device) FXS connects an end device, such as a telephone. It isn't an end device itself. Priscilla > FXO is a trunk line > > > > > Haakon Claassen > EMEA - IT Transport Services -WAN >

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread Haakon Claassen (hclaasse)
FXS is a station (end device) FXO is a trunk line Haakon Claassen EMEA - IT Transport Services -WAN Cisco Systems De Kleetlaan 6b - Pegasus Park B-1831 Diegem (Belgium) -Original Message- From: Chuck's Long Road

RE: FXO FXS terminology - comments? [7:54331]

2002-09-27 Thread Daniel Cotts
At least in the past it could be cost effective for a telephone customer to have a telephone with a number from a remote location. Usually because they made many numbers to phones located near that remote location. Such calls were considered local calls. So the savings in long distance charges wer