Sure but I don't think I would go and redistribute them. You may want
to consider setting up two HSRP groups. That way you could utilize both
routers and have redundancy between the two default routers.
A better understanding of your topology would be insightful.
Dave
Scott wrote:
>
> I
Is it possible to have 2 different routers in the same EIGRP AS each have a
different default route? Essentially, a router will send a packet to the
closest default route until 1 of those routes goes down, and then all will
use the workng route?
On Friday 11 January 2002 09:54 am, MADMAN wro
Wayne,
I thought about the question posed by Cisco Nuts last night. Why is EIGRP
configured differnently? The best thing I could come up with was the fact
that EIGRP can be autosummarizing in some parts of the AS, but not
necessarily all (and thus potentially modifying the default network from
You don't add the "network 0.0.0.0" to make it work otherwise your
right on though adding the default-network command will work I prefer
redistributing the static.
Dave
s vermill wrote:
>
> EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You
> first have to define a stati
ult-information in/out/allowed' under the 'router eigrp ')
WAYNE BAETY, MCSE, A1C, USAF
Network Systems Trainer
> -Original Message-
> From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:
t;
>Reply-To: "s vermill"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Fefault route for eigrp? [7:31592]
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:37:07 -0500
>
>EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You
>first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0
EIGRP behaves a little differently than all of the other protocols. You
first have to define a static 'ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x' and then
add a 'network 0.0.0.0' to your EIGRP config. I think you have to
'redistribute static' as well. It will not propogate a default as a result
of the '
7 matches
Mail list logo
