RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-04 Thread rbx10 Defcom
Hybrid version use two typee of software CAT OS and IOS Cat OS is used on the supervisory Engine (Where you define your vlan, set domain name, and port setting) while IOS is used on the MSFC. MSFC is the card that perform the routing. The native mode used only IOS making the switch look like a ro

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-04 Thread Karen E Young
Think about it... With Hybrid mode, the CPUs on the MSFC and the supervisor engine function independently. You have two user interfaces. With Native mode, the two devices are integrated with a single user interface and the CPU on the MSFC functions as the primary CPU for the switch. Karen **

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-04 Thread MADMAN
alaerte Vidali wrote: > I read something that scared me on the url > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_white_paper09186a00800c8441.shtml > > "Should the MSFC fail, all Layer 2/3/4 functionality is lost" > > We are currently running Hybrid mode, and more than once the

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-04 Thread alaerte Vidali
I read something that scared me on the url http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_white_paper09186a00800c8441.shtml "Should the MSFC fail, all Layer 2/3/4 functionality is lost" We are currently running Hybrid mode, and more than once the MSFC stop working (in differents e

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Bullwinkle
ADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:44 PM > > To: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766] > > > > > > DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: > > > We have a 6509 and I have h

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Larry Letterman
03, 2003 3:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766] > > > The big thing to watch out for is line card support. Most OSM cards > are only supported in Native mode and the inverse is true with many > voice modules. I can't think of any other o

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread MADMAN
gt; -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:44 PM > To: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766] > > > DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: > > We have a 6509 and I ha

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Mark Foster
There are still some functional/operational differences between 6500 hybrid and native modes with the current CatOS and IOS versions available. A white paper on the topic is located at (watch for any wrapping): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_white_paper09 186a00800c

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread MADMAN
What! I have a switch running Native in the lab with dual sups configured for RPR+, works fine. RPR is what the 7500's with dual RSPs use. Dave Joseph Brunner wrote: > HYBRID, Especiall for someone like you who needs uptime/redundancy. > > In hybrid, if the MSFC dies, you don't loose the wh

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Larry Letterman
er > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766] > > > HYBRID, Especiall for someone like you who needs uptime/redundancy. > > In hybrid, if the MSFC dies, you don't loose the whole switch, > just interv

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Larry Letterman
Behalf Of > DeVoe, Charles (PKI) > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766] > > > So if I read this right, it is just a different set of commands. > Are there > operational differences? > > -Origi

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Larry Letterman
Native means that the sup/msfc module is running IOS for the routing and switching, similar to the 3500 switches... Hybrid indicates that the switch sup will run Cat-os for the switching function and the msfc will run IOS for the routing functions...similar to a Cat5000 with the RSM... Larry

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
I was just reading about this the other day and book-marked this link (watch for wrap): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_tech_note0918 6a00801350b8.shtml Shawn K. -Original Message- From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
So if I read this right, it is just a different set of commands. Are there operational differences? -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:44 PM To: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766

Re: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread MADMAN
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: > We have a 6509 and I have heard talk about native vs. Hybrid mode of > operation. What is the difference? Is there a link to a white paper or > something? That question comes up periodically but the in a nutshell a 6500 in native mode is a big router, no catOS

RE: Hybrid vs. Native [7:66766]

2003-04-03 Thread Joseph Brunner
HYBRID, Especiall for someone like you who needs uptime/redundancy. In hybrid, if the MSFC dies, you don't loose the whole switch, just intervlan routing, etc. You can still telnet to the supervisor engine to get and and find out whats up. In native the whole switch dies and your burned. Cisco's