Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcc: Kevin Cullimore) Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] If you think about this logically, every IP address in your networkor the Internet is unique, regardless of mask, so why send the mask? The mask only becomes relevant locally. Symon --- > In the local configuration of ever

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread Symon Thurlow
12/20/01, steve skinner wrote: > >go on then pris.. > > > >you have wetted my appetite where is the the subnet mask kept if it isnt > >in the ip packet ? > > > > > > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > > >Reply-To: "Pris

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
imer" > >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] > >Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:42:36 -0500 > > > >From its own local config. The mask isn't in the IP packet, which does > >

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Steve, > >According to RFC-791 (ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc791.txt), all that is >contained in the IP header with respect to addresses is the source address >and the destination address, both 32 bit fields. The routers have the task >of figuring out where to send things based on the routing t

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread Ken Diliberto
where is the the subnet mask kept if it isnt in the ip packet ? >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] >Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:42:36 -0500 > >From its

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-20 Thread steve skinner
go on then pris.. you have wetted my appetite where is the the subnet mask kept if it isnt in the ip packet ? >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] >Da

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Donald
If the sending host strips the netmask how does the gateway know which route to use. - Original Message - From: "Tangled Up in Blue" To: Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 5:49 AM Subject: RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] > sorry for the double post, and i meant to say that

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread John Neiberger
Yes, the major network prefix includes all of its subnets. But once you've subnetted a prefix, you can't assign that prefix to an interface because you'll end up with overlapping network addresses. For example, let's say you have the address 172.16.1.0/24 and want to split it into two subnets.

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread W. Alan Robertson
er. Subnet masks are a Local thing. I hope this helps... Alan~ - Original Message - From: "Steven A. Ridder" To: Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:07 PM Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] > Say I have 2 networks: > > Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16 > and >

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Bill Carter
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] Say I have 2 networks: Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16 and Network 2. 172.16.2.x/24 We all agree that they are two different networks, right? Now if Host A on Network 1 is 172.16.2.1/16 and Host B is on Network 2 is 172.16.2.1/24, How does the host

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Logan, Harold
IL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] > > > Say I have 2 networks: > > Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16 > and > Network 2. 172.16.2.x/24 > > We all agree that they are two different netwo

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread MADMAN
You can't do that, it's a no no, network 1 thinks he's connected to 172.16.0.1 - 172.16.255.254 which obviouly OVERLAPS network 2, see: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/ip.htm Dave "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > Say I have 2 networks: > > Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Hire, Ejay
/16, it would work. ejh -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182] Say I have 2 networks: Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16 and Network 2. 172.16.2.x/24 We all

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Because the major network was subnetted, it includes all networks under it. Therefore it's the same network, just subnetted. Do I have it right? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29232&t=29182 -- FAQ, list archives

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread John Neiberger
** PRIVATE ** The problem here is that your premise is incorrect. 172.16.0.0/16 *includes* 172.16.2.0/24 so they are *not* different networks. If you configure your VLSM correctly you will not have this problem. Let's say you had a router with two ethernet interfaces. You would not want to co

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Say I have 2 networks: Network 1. 172.16.x.x/16 and Network 2. 172.16.2.x/24 We all agree that they are two different networks, right? Now if Host A on Network 1 is 172.16.2.1/16 and Host B is on Network 2 is 172.16.2.1/24, How does the host know that the second host is on a different netw

Re: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
>From its own local config. The mask isn't in the IP packet, which does come as a surpise to some people! If this isn't what you're getting at, just let us know... Priscilla At 08:20 AM 12/14/01, you wrote: >This may sound like a dumb quesion, but if I send a packet to a different >host, w

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
sorry for the double post, and i meant to say that "If it sees by the subnet mask that this address is not local, it strips the MAC info and the netmask and forwards the packet to the default gateway." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29186&t=29182 ---

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread richard beddow
The sending host uses its own address and mask to decide whether the destination host is on the local subnet or not. If not then the packet is forwarded to the default gateway (unless the host is running dynamic routing). When the packet reaches the router, the router checks the destination IP ag

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
good question. if i understand you, you are wondering how the remote device knows your subnet mask? the answer is it does not and it doesn't care either. when you send a packet from your PC to another host in the same network for instance you are saying, "according to my network, defined by my ne

RE: Mask in L3 Packet [7:29182]

2001-12-14 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
good question. if i understand you, you are wondering how the remote device knows your subnet mask? the answer is it does not and it doesn't care either. when you send a packet from your PC to another host in the same network for instance you are saying, "according to my network, defined by my ne