RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-14 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Jen, I see your point. I just finished a quick read of RFC 896 (Congestion Control in IP/TCP Internetworks) Recognizing that TCP is responsible for end to end reliable data communications, it would seem reasonable to think that the Nagle service should not effect transit traffic. On the other ha

Re: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-14 Thread Flem
Yep nagle is only for sessions with the router as one end of the connection. flem --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does setting 'service nagle' on a router have any > effect on TCP sessions > transitting the router, or does it only have an > effect on sessions that > terminate at the router? > Var

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-17 Thread jenny . mcleod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Nagle's algorithm Jen, I see your point. I just finished a quick read of RFC 896 (Congestion Control in IP/TCP Internetworks) Recognizing that TCP is responsible for end to end reliable

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
uot;Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: > > >Subject: RE: Nagle's algorithm > > >Jen, I see your point. I just finished a quick read of RFC 896 (Co

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-17 Thread jenny . mcleod
Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 18/12/2000 11:00:33 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: Nagle's algorithm At 10:15 AM 12/18/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Flem, thanks for the confirmation. >Chuck, given the age of the RFC, I se

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-17 Thread Chuck Larrieu
ay, December 17, 2000 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Nagle's algorithm Agreed - I abbreviated my response a bit more than I should have. I was thinking along the lines that a gateway/IMP (always makes me think of Maxwell's demon)/router at the time of RFC 896 wouldn&

Re: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-17 Thread Saša Milic
Chuck Larrieu wrote: > > end stations. The fact that it is stated that one should now enable the > algorithm if XRemote and XWindows is in operation on the network indicates > to me, at least, that pass through traffic effected. > > - > given connection. This method is usually good f

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-18 Thread Shaw, Winston Mr 5 SIG CMD
0 4:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Nagle's algorithm I don't know. This looks like another one of those things where we'd have to find the people at Cisco who actually introduced this service to the IOS to explain why it is there and what function it pe

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-18 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
I open a telnet session to the router from my X >desktop, is this what we are talking about? > >Chuck > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 6:14 PM >To:

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-18 Thread Marty Adkins
Here's an old one I saved in my archives but you could probably search for it on nexial as well. The main situation it addresses is the use of a router as a commserver, with a dumb terminal attached or dialed up. Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mentor Technologies

RE: Nagle's algorithm

2000-12-18 Thread Flem
It is somewhat long but interesting . All this nagle stuff has to to with end systems . At the bottom of this email is nagle himself about some tcp end station problems . flem Newsgroups: poster Subject: Re: Nagle algo. in Unix-TCP Summary: Expires: References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender