I personally had a Nov 4th lab date and was able to swap to a Oct 24th date
a couple of weeks ago. My thinking was that if they are getting rid of IPX
and token switch stuff(fairly easy), that content will be replaced by other
areas, not neccesarily the 3550 switch. I was totally geared up to take
If there weren't any bugs, it wouldn't be Cisco.
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I interpret the question to inquire if one should take "Lab version 1.0"
> or wait for "Lab version 1.01". There are bound to be bugs.
>
> >>> "The_Jester" 07/14/0
I interpret the question to inquire if one should take "Lab version 1.0"
or wait for "Lab version 1.01". There are bound to be bugs.
>>> "The_Jester" 07/14/02 04:40PM >>>
The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not
so hard that one needs to cheat to pass.
""Howard C. Berko
The proctors have been saying it in all the Networkers CCIE powersessions.
""Paul Jones"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Where did you hear that there were going to be two switches per rack? How
> do you know you won't have to do any CatIOS?? Please enlighten
Jester-
I think this was a fair question. I'm not asking for details, strictly
opinions. Just what part of my post did you find to be 'cheating'?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48828&t=48731
--
FAQ, list archi
Where did you hear that there were going to be two switches per rack? How
do you know you won't have to do any CatIOS?? Please enlighten me
ThanksThornton Hopkins wrote:
>
> You should go ahead and take it on the Nov.5. Just make sure
> you spend some time working on the 3550 EMI. There wi
You should go ahead and take it on the Nov.5. Just make sure you spend some
time working on the 3550 EMI. There will be two of them in each pod and you
will have to route between VLANs. The good new is that you will not have to
do any CatIOS (simple but still).
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not
so hard that one needs to cheat to pass.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 7:48 AM + 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote:
> >Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others
At 7:48 AM + 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote:
>Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the NDA
>before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the
>certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science.
Years ago, I was teaching a networking seminar at
Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the NDA
before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the
certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science.
""Gene Volpe"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have my lab sc
Gene,
That would probably be a good question for you to ask the Cisco CCIE
collective team:
http://www.ccbootcamp.com/askcisco.asp
I'm sure they might be able to help provide some additional insite into what
will happen on Nov. 5th.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I suspect it is going to become VERY difficult to find open dates in the few
weeks prior to November 4, the day the new format becomes official. Unless
you want to travel to one of the lesser utilized labs in South America or
the Pacific region.
Best advice? Maybe delay your attempt, and see what
12 matches
Mail list logo
