RE: RSVP

2000-08-15 Thread Irwin Lazar
See: http://www.isi.edu/div7/rsvp/rsvp.html We also have several other links to QoS information at http://www.itprc.com/qos.htm > -Original Message- > From: mohamed shommo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 10:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RSVP > > >

Re: RSVP

2000-08-15 Thread Alexander Pozdnjakov
Hi! Just ask for it :-) > I have some questions about WFQ and RSVP any one can help > thanks > mohamed shommo -- --- WBW, xander CCNA, CCNP (R&S), CCIE very soon :-) ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archiv

RE: RSVP & WFQ

2000-08-17 Thread Irwin Lazar
Have a look at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios111/cc111/dwfq.h tm for a discussion of various flavors of WFQ. RSVP is a different animal. RSVP is used to reserve specific resources across a path. See: http://www.isi.edu/div7/rsvp/rsvp.html for a discussion of RS

Re: RSVP & WFQ

2000-08-17 Thread Michael Fountain
I'm not familiar with RSVP, can I can help with WFQ. WFQ is enabled by default on nearly all serial interfaces with speeds less then 2Mbps. (Exceptions are if you are using SDLC, X.25, LAPB, compressed PPP, and maybe a couple others). WFQ is able to sense the various 'conversations' between e

Re: RSVP [7:48456]

2002-07-09 Thread Darren Ward
Yes, 10ms is the target for sample interval for assessing voip and real-time traffic. No the RSVP value is independant of the FRTS values but YOU want to make sure you have a match so you don't reserve more than you can provide or under reserve for your requirements ;) The golden formulae for FR

Re: RSVP [7:48456]

2002-07-10 Thread Luciano Borges Moraes
Hi There. I got your answer and I have more questions. 1-If instead of real-time apliccations traffic I had other IP traffic, could I use the value 125ms for TC (1/8s)? 2-Is there any formula for RSVP calculation in case (question) 1 or can I decide the value just "guessing"? 3-Based on CCO exam

Re: RSVP bandwidth reservation question

2000-05-11 Thread Joe Martin
I wouldn't use RSVP. Also, trying to have 12 phones supported by BRI is a bit tight. Hopefully you are anticipating that not all of the users will be on the phone at the same time. G.729 = 8K voice, but you must add IP overhead. Without CRTP each call takes about 25K. With CRTP each call take

Re: RSVP bandwidth reservation question

2000-05-12 Thread Tom Wojciaczyk
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t5/iprtp.htm Use RTP priority instead of RSVP. Also, if you are using multilink in any way, definitely use multilink interleaving. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/1750/cnfg_gds/voip_c

RE: rsvp question [7:63965]

2003-02-27 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Hi Paul, you set it on both physical and on sub-interface, for both p2p and multipoint setups. hth, Mark. -Original Message- From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rsvp question [7:63965] Hello, If

Re: RSVP and VOIP [7:42095]

2002-04-21 Thread dawn davis
yes, but not on the AS5300. You need an H.323 Proxy and/or Gatekeeper >From: "Lupi, Guy" >Reply-To: "Lupi, Guy" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RSVP and VOIP [7:42095] >Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:19:58 -0400 >Received: from [63.104.50.75] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBE8B2B400

RE: RSVP and VOIP [7:42095]

2002-04-22 Thread Lupi, Guy
bject: Re: RSVP and VOIP [7:42095] ~ ~ ~yes, but not on the AS5300. You need an H.323 Proxy and/or Gatekeeper ~ ~ ~>From: "Lupi, Guy" ~>Reply-To: "Lupi, Guy" ~>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>Subject: RSVP and VOIP [7:42095] ~>Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:19:58 -0400 ~>R