Wow..Two questions. What is doing your routing and What program is doing the file
transfer?
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/3/2000 at 3:05 PM jeongwoo park wrote:
>Hi all
>My file server is on 140.222.20.1/24
>Clients are on these four subnets.
>140.222.150.0/24
>140.222.
I don't think supernet will solve this problem! One of the purposes of Aggregate route
is to reduce router's
memory and stable network. You still have four subnets and router will route these
traffic.
My suggestion is :
1. Check Router forwarding rate( upgrade router ).
2. I
If you are using a Cisco router what type of switching is it using of the
interfaces in
question, process-switch, fast-switch, etc. ? Take a look at the interface
and processor
utilization as well, and the number of broadcast and errors on those
segments. I have found
those are more likely causes
JW, be more specific about your network topology. Where are the users in reference to
the server? What type of network hardware are you using (hubs, switches, etc.) and with
is the type and speed of your WAN links if any?? If you network does not have the
adequate horse power and bandwidth to han
If you supernet you will put all stations on one segement. Your network
would not slow down but come down.
You need to look to some switching design with fastether channel to the
server.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Groupstudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
I think it may be somewhat premature to assume that the performance issue stems from a
lack of bandwidth to the server. I think we still need to see the topology logically
and get a feel for what devices are doing what. Who's to say this isn't 600 people on
shared 10 with a nt box doing some
6 matches
Mail list logo
