> even though it's not quite conforming to spec.
>
> -Brant.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Erick B.
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 1:44 PM
> To: Steve Linney; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Behalf Of
Erick B.
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Steve Linney; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VTP Protocal Cisco 5000 and 3com Superstack II 1100
I read somewhere that they are working on revising the
802.1q standard to support per-vlan STPs and it's
based on Cisco's per vla
AIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on 01/10/2001 01:43:30 PM
Please respond to "Erick B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Linney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: VTP Protocal Cisco 5000 and 3com Superstack II 1100
I read somewhere that t
I read somewhere that they are working on revising the
802.1q standard to support per-vlan STPs and it's
based on Cisco's per vlan STP. Not sure what the
current status is. You could turn off STP to avoid
this I think (haven't tried) if your network layout
doesn't have any loops, etc. Of course, i
I was looking into this Cisco/non-Cisco switch issue just recently and was
told that the 802.1q standard stipulates only 1 x STP, and yet with Cisco's
802.1q implementation you can have per vlan STP (not quite matching the
802.1q standard). Perhaps someone in the group can clear this issue up for
Hi Rico
Take care ! I had many problems with set up a STP, trunking and
802.1q between Cisco 5000 and Bay Networks.
I gave up because finally I used just 1 link between these devices.
I was surprised to see that FastEtherChannel on Cisco means trunking on
Bays'.
This is what somebody from CISCO
Hi,
VTP is a Cisco propiertary method of automatically
learning about other VLANs in the network dynamically.
It is not supported on the 3Com SS 1100.
Look at the docs at support.3com.com. The SS-1100 does
support 802.1q which is a standard VLAN trunking
protocol supported by many vendors. You
7 matches
Mail list logo
