RE: link down problem

2000-09-20 Thread Omar Baceski
September 19, 2000 10:31 PM > Para: Omar Baceski; 'cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)' > Asunto: RE: link down problem > > But a loopback of the interface shows line protocol down as well > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Yee, Jason
But a loopback of the interface shows line protocol down as well -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Omar Baceski Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 8:40 PM To: cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail) Subject: RE: link down problem i suspect that the

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Yee, Jason
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: link down problem Jason, I would suspect a FR service provider fault then. The status of "inactive" for the PVC indicates the problem lies downstream/upstream of this router. >From Internetworking Troubleshooting Handbook p533 (Cisco Press) Frame Relay

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Yee, Jason
ok will try that out , thanks a lot Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 10:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: link down problem If you check the output from the router: LMI enq sent 18

Re: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Simon
If you check the output from the router: LMI enq sent 18, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI down this shows that the router is making LMI enquires of the switch [LMI enq sent 18], but is not receiving replies [LMI stat recvd 0] - ie. the LMI has not been activated on the local link. At

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Omar Baceski
i suspect that the problem is at the FR switch... if you remember the dlci status are: active: both ends and switch working inactive: near end and switch working, remote end dead deleted: the switch does not recognice the dlci number. i can see that in one of your routers you have an ACTIVE dlci

Re: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Simon
ill show down > > > >Jason > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Peter Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 1:27 PM > >To: Yee, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: link down problem > > > > > &

Re: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Peter Simmons
Tuesday, September 19, 2000 1:27 PM >To: Yee, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: link down problem > > > >Jason, > >(Lots of stuff snipped) > >The output from "show int s0" > >>Router#sh int s0 >>Serial0 is up, line protocol is down (looped) >

Re: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Peter Simmons
Jason, (Lots of stuff snipped) The output from "show int s0" >Router#sh int s0 >Serial0 is up, line protocol is down (looped) >Internet address is 202.161.128.158/30 shows the interface is looped at the CSU/DSU, doesn't it? Is this just a hangover from testing, or is this the cause? Regards

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Yee, Jason
This is the hangover from testing not the cause after loop back is disabled the line protocol still show down Jason -Original Message- From: Peter Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 1:27 PM To: Yee, Jason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: link down

RE: link down problem

2000-09-19 Thread Yee, Jason
I am positive that I am looking at the same pvc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: link down problem Don't forget that the DLCI is only locally s