===
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kenneth
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: loadbalancing with NIC's
The 6509 will see it as 2 separate MAC addresses. Based on my
conversation
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: loadbalancing with NIC's
>Howard,
>Did you see either of my posts on this issue.
>I think that they hit the list, but I heard nary a
The 6509 will see it as 2 separate MAC addresses. Based on my conversation
with Ipmetrics engineer (i think it was them) the way it functions is this:
Server A has ip 192.168.1.5
The NIC that is capable of loadbalancing maintains two unique MAC addresses.
Everytime a client generates an arp req
-623-3429 Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bob Vance
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 5:27 PM
To: CISCO_GroupStudy List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: loadbalancing with NIC's
> Otherwise, t
]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: loadbalancing with NIC's
>We are planning to connect a server with a single NIC that supports
>faultolerance , redudndancy and load balancing. How does a C6509 treat
a
>We are planning to connect a server with a single NIC that supports
>faultolerance , redudndancy and load balancing. How does a C6509 treat a
>Nic that is connected to two of its ports (same vlans)
>Mo Durrani
Multiple Fast EtherChannel aware NICs can load-share on the same
VLAN. Otherwise
6 matches
Mail list logo