RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread Kris Keen
You could try and set the bridge priority Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39981&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread yonghai zhang
even if i set my switch priority 65535(max value), but i can't sure wnen a new switch add with a same priority and a different higher MAC address, which lead to my switch become root. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40001&t=39975 ---

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread Larry Letterman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] even if i set my switch priority 65535(max value), but i can't sure wnen a new switch add with a same priority and a different higher MAC address, which lead to my switch become

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread yonghai zhang
as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40011&t=39975 -- FAQ, list a

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread Larry Letterman
:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn't become a root swtich,so i set a higher priority in my switch,which method can be sure my swithc never come to root? thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread Kris Keen
How about setting your priority to 1? That will make it the root :D or even 0! Default is 32768. We always make ours 0 or 1, I never use set spantree root.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40015&t=39975 -- FAQ, li

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-03-31 Thread yonghai zhang
i have understanded it and thanks for Kris Keen ,Larry Letterman and groupstudy board, give me a more help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40016&t=39975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.grou

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread Tim O'Brien
If you turn off Spanning Tree, the switch will "never" become root. Tim 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] as you know, my switch doesn'

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groups Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread Rik Guyler
switch [7:39975] How about setting your priority to 1? That will make it the root :D or even 0! Default is 32768. We always make ours 0 or 1, I never use set spantree root.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40024&

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread Tim O'Brien
l 01, 2002 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] Hi, Just a reminder,Higher priority means lower value.. If still not becoming a root bridge,use this command "set spantree root" Kin

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax to: 01/04/2002 Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975]

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread Larry Letterman
] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] At 01:50 AM 4/1/02, Larry Letterman wrote: >For the most part here at Cisco, we have no guarrantee >that setting a switch to root will stop another switch from >coming up as root. However, we set all our roots/sec roots by issuing >the set spantree root c

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-01 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
something else maybe? Thanks, Priscilla >Larry Letterman >Cisco Systems >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:12 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: root switch

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-02 Thread EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR)
orized switching devices from being connected to the LAN via the user ports. We use it in our organization, and it is effective. Treece -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root sw

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-02 Thread Larry Letterman
that is correct. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR) Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] I'm ass