. The
later cards may be the "G" cards. Can anyone comment?
> -Original Message-
> From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RSFC or RSM, MSM or MSFC, PFC or NFFC?? [7:40259]
>
>
&
PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Cisco Nuts
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RSFC or RSM, MSM or MSFC, PFC or NFFC?? [7:40259]
>
>
> Hel
You would hopefully never implement an RSFC or an RSM or an MSM
because they do not have the performance capabilities of either an MSFC1
or MSFC2. The actual question is, which chassis... 7603, 6506, 6509,
6513...
which Supervisor Engine... SUP1A, SUP2... which MSFC... MSFC1 or MSFC2...
how much
The RSM and RSFC are used by the 5000, and the MSFC is used
by the 6000 family. I am not sure about the NFFC/RSM, But the
PFC is used here in our switches for policy switching, vacls and etc.
I believe the MSM was a fore-runner to the MSFC, however if I am wrong
I am sure some here will be quick
Hello,
When would one implement a RSFC over a RSM or a MSFC over a MSM? Also, do
these cards go along with a NFFC II (for the RSM or RSFC) and a PFC (for the
MSM or the MSFC)?
What would be the disadvantage if any of not using a NFFC II with a RSFC or
the PFC with the MSFC?
Thank you.
__
5 matches
Mail list logo
