Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Frank Merrill
> > > > Yes, they do want to do it, and will retire the 3524-PWR as > soon as they > can. > > Uh if they DO want to do it (have switches with inline > power), then why > would they want to retire the 3524-PWR?!?!?! ( I know there's > the > 4000/6000s but I doubt you'll see someone putting a

RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Frank Merrill
Giuseppe Citerna wrote: > > Hi , > i have the lab at october, and i dont know what is switch , > 5000 or 3550?! > It's true that CCIE must knowns every things, but the game must > be equal for all, and therefore the ccie candidate must known > what is the equipment list. > what about?! > thanks

RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Brian Backer
Why does it matter since they said clearly that any 3550 specific options won't be used until mid-November?!?!? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updat

RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Giuseppe Citerna
Hi , i have the lab at october, and i dont know what is switch , 5000 or 3550?! It's true that CCIE must knowns every things, but the game must be equal for all, and therefore the ccie candidate must known what is the equipment list. what about?! thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstud

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Steven A. Ridder
They're going to retire the 3524 PWR because it dosen't have the new "AVVID" capabilites of the new 2950/3550's. They're just waiting for the IEEE to ratify the new 802.3af standard, so they can include it into the 3550 switches. I guess the new standards will use different pins and wires to del

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Michael L. Williams
"Frank Merrill" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Michael L. Williams wrote: > > > > Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s > > and 3550s that > > support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does > > provide > > inline power.

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Michael L. Williams wrote: > > Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s > and 3550s that > support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does > provide > inline power. Can't they make up their mind as to whether > they want to > do it or not?!?!?! Yes, they d

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Michael L. Williams
Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s and 3550s that support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does provide inline power. Can't they make up their mind as to whether they want to do it or not?!?!?! As far as the 3550 replacing the 5000, it says "However

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Chuck Ryan wrote: > > Do you have the link for this change? I've just searched CCO, > the CCIE > "what's new" area specifically, and I see no mention of this > anywhere. That's exactly where I found it under the 'What's New' section (18). Here's the link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/c

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just > on principal, > as one probably installs more of them in a job then the > 6500's. The only > problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until > next year when > 802.3af is ratified. > > -- >

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Chuck wrote: > > The way I read this, between 9/1 and 11/4 there will still be > token ring > switches in the Lab, and you may still have to be able to work > with them. > > Make sense? Makes sense to me! I suspect, based on that new info, that all of those topics will have to be dealt with now

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Chuck Ryan
Do you have the link for this change? I've just searched CCO, the CCIE "what's new" area specifically, and I see no mention of this anywhere. - Original Message - From: "Frank Merrill" To: Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:43 PM Subject: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623] > It would app

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just on principal, as one probably installs more of them in a job then the 6500's. The only problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until next year when 802.3af is ratified. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""jeff sicuranza"" wr

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread jeff sicuranza
I tell you this is becoming utter nonsense. As I mentioned in an older post I picked up an awesome 5505 for a song and I was expecting to use it to prepare for my first lab attempt on 9/9. ThenÂ… this news comes out about the 3550. Okay no problem, if I nail the lab the first time(I wish! and will

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Chuck
The way I read this, between 9/1 and 11/4 there will still be token ring switches in the Lab, and you may still have to be able to work with them. Make sense? ""Frank Merrill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Tom Scott
Frank Merrill wrote: > Therefore, effective November 4th, 2002, the following topics will no longer > be tested on the CCIE Routing and Switching exam: > > IGRP > Token Ring > Token Ring Switching > IPX I wonder, will the new 640-60x tests drop IPX? -- TT Message Posted at: http://www.g