Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Ralph Fudamak
I don't know how Motorola implements OSPF, but with Cisco's implementation you can not do unequal cost load balancing with OSPF. This is not to say that you can't manually change the metrics on the links to appear to be equal cost. Keep in mind that this load balancing is *equal* then. Your slow

Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Cisco Breaker
As I said before I implemented equal load balancing on Motorola and Cisco what I want to know is, Is it possible to configure OSPF unequal load balancing ? You are saying that OSPF unequal load balancing can not be done on cisco I know that. The reason why I asked the question is cause I know that

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Logan, Harold
I just took a quick look at RFC's 1583 and 1247. OSPFv2 does not support unequal-cost load balancing. > -Original Message- > From: Cisco Breaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OSPF Unequa

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Kane, Christopher A.
nt: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311] As I said before I implemented equal load balancing on Motorola and Cisco what I want to know is, Is it possible to configure OSPF unequal load balancing ? You are saying that OSPF un

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Logan, Harold
oughts. > Chris > > -Original Message- > From: Kane, Christopher A. > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311] > > > You can read RFC 2328 or John T Moy's OSPF Anatomy of a &g

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
- >From: Cisco Breaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:08 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311] > > >As I said before I implemented equal load balancing on Motorola and Cisco >what I want to know is

Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread Jonathan Hays
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > It is an OSPF design principle. Essentially, current-generation > routing protocols (i.e., without traffic engineering) are incapable > of doing other than hop-by-hop load sharing, which may lead to > extremely poor end-to-end utilization. > > The IETF consensus is

Re: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread MADMAN
I can give you a good example of utilizing EIGRP unequal cost load balancing I had done. A customer had three T1's to a remote site. Two were p-t-p and the other was a channel off of a T3. When the T3 was added EIGRP choose it, ignoring the other two T1's. Using the variance command I forced E

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-26 Thread HANS PHAM
Cisco Breaker wrote: > > I implemented OSPF load balancing but never done unequal load > balancing. My > customer wants Unequal loadbalancing on Motorola routers. As I > know Unequal > load balancing cant be implemented on Cisco without policy-map? > Any > suggestions or any info? > > Best regar

RE: OSPF Unequal load balancing? [7:27311]

2001-11-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Cisco Breaker wrote: >> >> I implemented OSPF load balancing but never done unequal load >> balancing. My >> customer wants Unequal loadbalancing on Motorola routers. As I >> know Unequal >> load balancing cant be implemented on Cisco without policy-map? >> Any >> suggestions or any info?