Ahhh Carbon Paper, I remember it well. And typewriter erasers with little metal
templates that allowed you to erase just one letter (sometimes) not to mention
white out. Perhaps some of the "good-old-days" weren't so good!
Tom Lisa, Instructor, CCNA, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Ci
I stand corrected Jay... ;) Those are pretty cool ;)
Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
Home: (215) 340-1440
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/7/00 2:15:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< > Can a typewriter print pictures ;)
Yep.
A few mild examples...
http://users.in
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Thomas Lisa wrote:
> The first place where I was hired as a Dir. of MIS, considered Computer Word
> Processing to be IBM Selectrics with memory!
Actually, the term "Word Processing" was coined by IBM. My father's
office had a number of "Mag Card Selectric Typewriters" which
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can a typewriter print pictures ;)
Yep.
A few mild examples...
http://users.inetw.net/~mullen/ascii.htm
--
Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
Wes
Can a typewriter print pictures ;)
Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
Home: (215) 340-1440
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/7/00 1:25:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> What's a typewriter? Kind of like a printer with a keyboard a
The first place where I was hired as a Dir. of MIS, considered Computer Word
Processing to be IBM Selectrics with memory!
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> Excellent summary, Jenny. Let me add a couple of things. I'm just
> out of the hospital after getting traceroutes of my heart, and it
> seems
> > > >PU type 1 were really stupid terminals. Reaching back in my memory
> > > >archives, I think it was the 3176 that was an SNA-attached Selectric
> > > >typewriter. Whatever the number, there was one. Frightening...a fair
> > > >number of people on the list probably haven't ever seen a Selec
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, David C Prall wrote:
> > >PU type 1 were really stupid terminals. Reaching back in my memory
> > >archives, I think it was the 3176 that was an SNA-attached Selectric
> > >typewriter. Whatever the number, there was one. Frightening...a fair
> > >number of people on the list
> >PU type 1 were really stupid terminals. Reaching back in my memory
> >archives, I think it was the 3176 that was an SNA-attached Selectric
> >typewriter. Whatever the number, there was one. Frightening...a fair
> >number of people on the list probably haven't ever seen a Selectric
> >typewrit
Never seen a Selectric typewriter??? I actually own one...
[=`)
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: SNA device types
>Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:1
Excellent summary, Jenny. Let me add a couple of things. I'm just
out of the hospital after getting traceroutes of my heart, and it
seems vaguely appropriate to talk about SNA.
SNA is an old technology, possibly dating back to the Garden of Eden.
Is it any coincidence that the first three let
]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNA device types
Darren,
you are mostly right, but a bit mixed up.
In SNA there are PU types and LU types.
The PU type describes the function/capabilities of the device within the SNA
hierarchy:
PU types:
5VTAM (SSCP)
4FEP
3 there is no PU type 3
Darren,
you are mostly right, but a bit mixed up.
In SNA there are PU types and LU types.
The PU type describes the function/capabilities of the device within the SNA
hierarchy:
PU types:
5VTAM (SSCP)
4FEP
3 there is no PU type 3
23274/3174 cluster controller, 3777 RJE sta
Question for all:
In the SNA hierarchy there are defined types 5,4,2 and 1 nodes.
>From what I've read so far I've assembled the following:
Type 5IBM Mainframe (Runs VTAM) SSCP
& PU5
Type 43705/3725/3745/3746 FEP/Communications ControllersPU4
Type
14 matches
Mail list logo