SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Pierre-Alex
Please pardon my ignorance. Why did Cisco invent RMON? SNMP seems to do exactly the same job (i.e. it provides information on all aspects of the network). I must be missing something ... _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Pierre-Alex
Thanks Willy! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Willy Schoots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:20 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON RMON gives you a lot more network traffic information than SNMP does. With FULL RMON capabilities you can

Re: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Andy Walden
>From what I have read, RMON incorporates a lot more layer-2 functionality. andy On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Pierre-Alex wrote: > Please pardon my ignorance. > > Why did Cisco invent RMON? > > SNMP seems to do exactly the same job (i.e. it provides information on all > aspects of the network). > >

Re: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread ccarring
RMON is specified by RFCs from the IETF. Basically, RMON 1 (RFC1757) extends an SNMP agent to record layer 2 statistics for a network segment. RMON 2 (RFC2021) provides similar history, for layers 3 through 7 - again, for a network segment. So, setting up RMON within an SNMP agent causes the ag

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
anything, but it would be nice to know," my interpretation was that this was not something to develop. > >From: Willy Schoots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:20 AM >To: Pierre-Alex >Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON > > >RMON gives you a lot

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Estes, Timothy R.
FLT TE-2 Tampa FL 33674 Phone - (813) 829-4563 desk Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cisco Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON Thanks Willy! Pierre-Alex -Original

Re: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 10:06 AM 1/8/01, Pierre-Alex wrote: >Please pardon my ignorance. > >Why did Cisco invent RMON? They didn't invent it. The IETF developed RMON in the early 1990s because the standard MIBs at the time lacked statistics on data-link and physical-layer parameters. The standard MIBs were focused

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Tony van Ree
, Pierre-Alex wrote: > > Thanks Willy! > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: Willy Schoots [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:20 AM > To: Pierre-Alex > Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON > > > RMON gives you a lot more net

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Pierre-Alex
versus RMON At 10:06 AM 1/8/01, Pierre-Alex wrote: >Please pardon my ignorance. > >Why did Cisco invent RMON? They didn't invent it. The IETF developed RMON in the early 1990s because the standard MIBs at the time lacked statistics on data-link and physical-layer parameters. The stan

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Pierre-Alex
Very useful! Thank You. -Original Message- From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:20 PM To: Pierre-Alex; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cisco Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON Hi, I have found RMON more useful as a trouble shooting tool particularly on

Re: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Paul Borghese
-Original Message- > From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:20 PM > To: Pierre-Alex; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Cisco > Subject: RE: SNMP versus RMON > > > Hi, > > I have found RMON more useful as a trouble shooting tool particula

RE: SNMP versus RMON

2001-01-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:19 PM >To: Pierre-Alex; Cisco >Subject: Re: SNMP versus RMON > > >At 10:06 AM 1/8/01, Pierre-Alex wrote: > >Please pardon my ignorance. > > > >Why did Cisco i