RE: subnet mask question [7:35357]

2002-02-14 Thread Chris Charlebois
Yeah, if you ping any 127.X.X.X for a workstation, you should get a reply from the loopback. That entire class A is reserved for loopback addresses. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35402&t=35357 -- FAQ, list archiv

Re: subnet mask question [7:35357]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
If you look at 127.0.0.0 in binary, it's a class A. ""Simon Yang (ITeX)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We know that 127.0.0.1 is for loopback. > If we need to assing a subnet mask for it, what the number should be. > for Class A, the noraml subnet mask is 255.0

subnet mask question [7:35357]

2002-02-13 Thread Simon Yang (ITeX)
We know that 127.0.0.1 is for loopback. If we need to assing a subnet mask for it, what the number should be. for Class A, the noraml subnet mask is 255.0.0.0 for Class B, the normail subnet mask is 255.255.0.0. 127 is not belong to Class A and B. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

RE: Subnet Mask question [7:25694]

2001-11-09 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
I didn't see this come through the list so I'm re-posting. -Original Message- From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:01 AM To: Cisco GroupStudy List Subject: RE: Subnet Mask question [7:25602] I'm assuming that you en

RE: Subnet Mask question [7:25602]

2001-11-08 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
"inconsistent address and mask." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Telemachus Luu Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subnet Mask question [7:25602] Hi, Can someone provide a good explanation

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Clayton Dukes
om: Brian Lodwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Subnet mask question.. > Brian, >I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't they > just state the mask as it should be -contig

RE: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Daniel Boutet1
Behalf Of Brian Lodwick Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subnet mask question.. Brian, I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't they just state the mask as it should be -contiguous bits left to right(except for wildcard

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Brian Lodwick
Brian, I hate the way these tests word their questions sometimes. Why don't they just state the mask as it should be -contiguous bits left to right(except for wildcard masks ofcourse). If they are going to state the subnet portion is stealing 11 bits from the host portion of the address why

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Craig Columbus
This is a matter of how the question was phrased. If a class B address had 11 bits of subnetting, then the mask is 255.255.255.224. Why? Because a class B address has NO bits of subnetting to begin with. You take the binary, ..., and to that you add 11 bits, and

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Nobody
Default netmask for class B is 255.255.0.0 with 11 subnet mask you will have /27 ie 255.255.255.224 it's bit confusing though.. Nobody Keith Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question still gets > me.

RE: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-10 Thread McCallum, Robert
: Neil Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2000 13:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subnet mask question.. I thought that was strange when I first saw a question like that. Oh Well, Cisco does things there own way. Neil Schneider "Keith Woodworth" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-10 Thread Neil Schneider
I thought that was strange when I first saw a question like that. Oh Well, Cisco does things there own way. Neil Schneider "Keith Woodworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question stil

RE: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-10 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jeroen Timmer wrote: >>Well 11 bits of subnetting is : 255.255.255.224 >> >>Class B subnet is always 255.255.x.x so 11 bits of subnetting means after >>the first 2 255's you got 11 bits of subnetting. Wich is another 255 and >>then 3 bits of the host adress wich comes to 22

RE: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-10 Thread Jeroen Timmer
dress. So 62 is the last host you can use ! Hope this solves it for you :) JT. -Original Message- From: Keith Woodworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: dinsdag 10 oktober 2000 7:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subnet mask question.. Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd s

Subnet mask question..

2000-10-09 Thread Keith Woodworth
Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question still gets me. Boson question: IP address 172.16.3.57 w/ and 11-bit subnet mask. What are valid hosts? I think ok class B, but I look at 11 bits as 255.224.0.0 (.1110.0.0) which does not go with the choices of answers I

RE: Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-10 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
ensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ -Original Message- From: Dick Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Newbe -- Subnet mask question Group --

Re: Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-08 Thread Earl Aboytes
The 192 comes from the admin. If you were the admin of a network, and maybe you are, you would probably get a full class 'C' (255.255.255.0) from your ISP or maybe ARIN. You would decide how you want to divide that network. If you wanted to divide it into two parts you would extend your mask by

RE: Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-08 Thread m. jean stockton
PROTECTED] Subject: Newbe -- Subnet mask question Group -- Some enlightenment is appreciated. The following two examples are directly from Todd Lammle's CCNA book, 2nd edition. Pages 140 and 141. 1st example: Given a network address of:192.168.10.0 Given a subnet mask: 255.255.25

Re: Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-07 Thread John Neiberger
These numbers are the decimal version of their binary equivalents. The binary bit positions have the following values, from left to right: 128,64,32,16,8,4,2, and 1. You can determine the decimal equivalent of a binary number by adding up the values for the bit positions. 255 (decimal) =

Re: Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-07 Thread Jay Hennigan
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Dick Silva wrote: > Group -- > > Some enlightenment is appreciated. > > The following two examples are directly from Todd Lammle's CCNA book, 2nd > edition. Pages 140 and 141. > > 1st example: > > Given a network address of:192.168.10.0 > > Given a subnet mask: 255

Newbe -- Subnet mask question

2000-07-07 Thread Dick Silva
Group -- Some enlightenment is appreciated. The following two examples are directly from Todd Lammle's CCNA book, 2nd edition. Pages 140 and 141. 1st example: Given a network address of:192.168.10.0 Given a subnet mask: 255.255.255.192 < Where does this 192 come from? I understan

Re: subnet mask question on NT

2000-05-08 Thread Ryan Block
It is automatically added in NT. Do a route print and u will see the route table on ur NT machine. Ryan andre wrote: > Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255) > on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm > > running into a wall on NT

subnet mask question on NT

2000-05-08 Thread andre
Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255) on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm running into a wall on NT. The conventional way through control panel doesn't work, it gives me an error. Does anyone know of any software to make th