This was done last year by both MS and Mklinux. There were more DOS attacks
than anything. In the end Mklinux was cracked because of a bad cgi script. I
think it would have been a different story had all ports been locked down.
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Lou Nelson wrote:
> Better yet,
> Advertise it t
page of the New York Times
Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA
- Original Message -
From: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Kavenaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: Switch backplace cap
/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca6000.htm
Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "McCormick, Corey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: Switch bac
Sure - go ahead and send it. I'll see what I can do.
Kenny
- Original Message -
From: "James Kavenaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Switc
> "McCormick, Corey" wrote:
>
> I have noticed that these numbers are actually not necessarily
> accurate either.
>
> The Catalyst 6509 has a backplane quoted as having 256Mb/sec,
> 128Mb/sec, 32Mb/sec and 16Mb/sec. Which is true? Sort of they all
> are, from my current information.
Basical
ed it "someday".
Feargal
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
I've wondered about this myself. Consider the Catalyst 4006 as
Actually I just priced one for a client and when you have folks running
gigabit to the desktop and 40 dual P3's slabs dumping rendered digtal
video.
it does not take long to gobble up 60 gigs.
Don't discount giga to the desk top.
Remember people laughed at 100 meg to the desktop.
I mean, r
Hi,
Could you please tell me more about these security holes, back doors and
incompatibilities you mention? Are you speaking of just the kernel or are you
including daemons that run on unix platforms? Maybe I could send you my ip
and you could show me how trivial it is to cack?
Thanks!
James
CTED]>
To: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Kenny Sallee wrote, with the
ve Linux the credit its due.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kenny Sallee
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 3:01 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
Yea - if you want to
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Kenny Sallee wrote, with the following in his headers:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
> Yea - if you want to put your enterprise on an OS full of security holes,
> back doors, and incompatibilities..
Title: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
I have noticed that these numbers are actually not necessarily accurate either.
The Catalyst 6509 has a backplane quoted as having 256Mb/sec, 128Mb/sec, 32Mb/sec and 16Mb/sec. Which is true? Sort of they all are, from my
]>
To: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "John Neiberger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
> According to the linux folks, you still don't.
Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
"We'll never need more than 640k of memory". What they said in the "old
days".
Kenny
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 20
"We'll never need more than 640k of memory". What they said in the "old
days".
Kenny
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Switch back
nday, July 03, 2000 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?
I've wondered about this myself. Consider the Catalyst 4006 as an example.
It has a 60 Gbps backplane. Yes, you read that correctly...SIXTY gigabits
per second...in a chassi
I've wondered about this myself. Consider the Catalyst 4006 as an example.
It has a 60 Gbps backplane. Yes, you read that correctly...SIXTY gigabits
per second...in a chassis that can hold five modules plus a supervisor
module. Do we really *need* that much?
My guess is no, we do not need qui
Got another discussion question before I start work this morning ( no 4 day
holiday for me :-< ) sort of a continuation of the Brad Ellis discussion
about the SE over-engineering solutions for customers.
Cisco of late is starting to talk about backplane capacity, and in
particular expandable ba
18 matches
Mail list logo
