John,
You cheated, and you didn't need to - I'm half drunk anyway. I had no chance
:-)
Will your access list allow 10.x.208.x ???It stops at 207.
I tried to allow from 200 upwards in the third octet which I still think is:
10.0.200.32 0.255.55.31
Answer me quick - two more pints and I
I wanted it done! :-) Seriously, it's not really clear but it's going
to save me a lot of time and energy down the road. Because our
addressing scheme is standardized, certain types of equipment will have
similar IP addressing. In this case, we're configuring VoIP and the
voice traffic will al
; "Jim Brown" 9/14/01 1:28:30 PM >>>
10.0.200.32 mask 0.255.0.15
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ugly Access Lists [7:19996]
I just had to write the ug
You're having a laugh. Is that a Friday Funny? Who wanted that done? Why?
Using the - Cheat, do it in your head, get it terribly wrong method:
access list 101 permit ip any 10.0.200.32 0.255.55.31
Too many beers in to Friday night to check it, or even think about it. I'll
regret posting this t
10.0.200.32 mask 0.255.0.15
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ugly Access Lists [7:19996]
I just had to write the ugliest access list I've ever personally
configured. I h
I just had to write the ugliest access list I've ever personally
configured. I had to allow the following traffic:
- First octet must be 10
- Second octect can be anything
- Third octect must start with 200
- Fourth octet must be in the .32 subnet, assuming a /27 mask length.
Using a single
6 matches
Mail list logo
