Re: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways,

I didn't follow the exact situation here and so I'm not sure what went through here. But to answer Pradeep's question " BTW, how many people from this forum have you really "placed" Any figures ? " , the way I look at it, if you are a professional headhunter, it's not so much how many you have pl

RE: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways,

EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways, > > > Pradeep, > Your conduct is disgraceful, your timing appaling, your lack of sincerity > embarassing. > Rest assured that were you inclined to treat me with the same > contempt and > sheer bl

Re: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways,

people like you, on the global internet, or otherwise. Alex >From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways, >Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:50:0

Re: You were good ,but biased too.good luck anyways,

Good grief, Pradeep, get the he** off of your soapbox, will ya?? You have absolutely no idea how to conduct yourself in an appropriate manner, and this posting proves that out. When wishing someone well, why do you feel it necessary to bring up old arguments? Raymond is a highly respected membe