Hi ,
I have a dialup problem with 5300 running 122-11.T1.
Sometimes users login but disconnected.
I see user authenticated from radius. but then they are disconnected.
It is interesting that this occurs SOMETIMES, not allways.
when I reload the router problem disapears.
At the end I will write
y, I think I'll hold out for #! :-)
> >
> >Todd
>
>
> Wonder if there's a CCIE #?
>
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Manny Gonzalez"
> >To: "Todd Carswell"
> >Cc: "John Mistichel
ent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:12 AM
>Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Practice WorkBook ECP-1. Any Comments.
>
>
>> Todd, shoot for 4 numbers dude. You don't want a "zip code" do you? :-)
>>
>> Although CCIE# 1 would be neat!
>>
Very extensive, mad :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40800&t=40785
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL P
any comments on my acl page ?
http://members.aol.com/pwilk517/private/ciscoacl.html
Please have a look, Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40785&t=40785
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
~~
> http://www.RouterChief.com
> ~~~
> NEED A JOB ???
> http://www.oledrews.com/job
> ~~~~~~~
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04,
~
http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
NEED A JOB ???
http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~
-Original Message-
From: Lee James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Commen
Message-
> From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:11 PM
> To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
>
>
> Ole, just a word of experience here, don'
rry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:11 PM
To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
Ole, just a word of experience here, don't let this drag on too long without
insisting that telco goes t
L PROTECTED]
512/434-1838
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
Thanks Michael, and everyone else who have replied to my e
46 PM
To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
I have worked on the telco side and as you can imagine, this happens a bit..
At least you were working with the telco.. You don't know how many people
would refuse to chang
7;; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
Ole,
It is not unheard of for a cable between the CSU and the demarc (SJ) to
start flaking out. You said that "you did that", meaning what? Did you
replace the cable and reset the WIC or did you do one and not
Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
I can see there's a remote alarm when the PVC went down the last time, which
to me looks like the problem isn't my DSU nor the cable. Any comments to
that?
Thanks,
Ole
~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNP, MCSE,
ews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
My networking skills are apparently being tested these days, because the
frame relay circuit went down to one of my branch offices.
I got someo
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
My networking skills are apparently being tested these days, because the
frame relay circuit went down
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
A) No. But next time try "clear controller s 0/0" or whatever slot it's in.
B) Carriers never admit they have a problem
C) It could have
te
Network Analyst CCNA,MCP,LANCP
Temple Inland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
512/434-1838
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
My network
orrected the error on their
>site, but now is trying to make it look like it was my equipment that was
>faulty, or (C)
>
>Thanks for any comments to this,
>
>Ole
>
>~~~
> Ole Drews Jensen
> Systems Network Manage
Ole,
I don't know why so many telcos/service providers are loath to admit they
had a problem. Probably has to do with guarantee-of-service contracts to
some extend, and just plain corporate culture to another extent. Being
someone who grew up in the WAN/Carrier/transport world, I can say that i
It's not uncommon. It was probably a bad cable more than a loose WIC.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/or
replace the WAN cable, and that it can cause carrier transitions, or is this
more likely (B) my provider that has found and corrected the error on their
site, but now is trying to make it look like it was my equipment that was
faulty, or (C)
Thanks for any comments to this,
Ole
In a message dated 9/3/00 11:48:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Hssi4/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is M2T-HSSI-B
MTU 4470 bytes, BW 45045 Kbit, DLY 200 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation HDLC, crc 16, loopback not
hi anyone got any comments on this show interface results :
what conclusion can we draw on this sh interface results
any form of input will be greatly appreciated
Hssi4/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is M2T-HSSI-B
MTU 4470 bytes, BW 45045 Kbit, DLY 200 usec,
reliability 255
Eric,
We have 2 remote offices that run VPN to our HQ over DSL. The router that we
use are 2611's with 64 MB DRAM and 16 MB flash. We are using 12.1(2)T. Previous
to 12.1(2)T, we used another version of IOS (I can't remember which one), but
it gave us allsorts of headaches. The SF office has been
Looking to setup a customer with internet connectivity with the requirement
of VPN site to site in the scope. I was thinking about putting the
IPSEC/3DES IOS on the routers and forgo the use of any additional hardware.
Suggestions?
Eric
___
UPDATED Posting Guid
25 matches
Mail list logo
