Re: OT: anyone has Redback experience?

On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Phillip Heller wrote: I work with Redback stuff quite a bit. Mostly the SMS 1k and the SMS 1800. I'm just now starting to work with the SMS 10K. Pros: You'll swear they ripped off cisco's command parser and syntax Contexts are cool. they probably did, but that

OT: anyone has Redback experience?

Hi all, Does anyone have a good experience with Redback products? Also I think I have a good knowledge about the follwoing two term. MLS (Multilayer Switching - layer 3 switching term ) and MPS(Multiple layer server - ATM term.) But, what about MPLS(?) Is this redback-specific? Regards,

Re: anyone has Redback experience?

: "Jae Kang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 12:32 AM Subject: OT: anyone has Redback experience? Hi all, Does anyone have a good experience with Redback products? Also I think I have a good knowledge about the follwoing two term. MLS (

Re: anyone has Redback experience?

an all Cisco command line interface (go figure, very few new commands to learn)... Legend has it that UUNET engineers insisted Redback come up with a Ciscoesque CLI so as to soften their learning curve. :Fuzz **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to

RE: anyone has Redback experience?

Title: RE: anyone has Redback experience? No firsthand experience with Redbacks, sorry to say. MPS = MPOA (Multiprotocol Over ATM) MPLS = MultiProtocol Label Switching; it's a relatively new standard (i.e. not specific to any vendor) that paints frames with an additional header. This speeds

Re: OT: anyone has Redback experience?

I work with Redback stuff quite a bit. Mostly the SMS 1k and the SMS 1800. I'm just now starting to work with the SMS 10K. Pros: You'll swear they ripped off cisco's command parser and syntax Contexts are cool. Cons: Their QA process is a bit, umm, deficient. (hardware, and software)