.
Regards
Adam
-Original Message-
From: xc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 30 April 2001 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498]
I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These
IOS's
same here...
Tim LeBrun
CCNA, CCDA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Woltynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498]
Recently did the same
I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These
IOS's are resource hogs, so apparently I need to pump up the DRAM and flash.
So, has anybody tried out some of those non-Cisco approved DRAM and flash
units? Don't worry, none of my routers are going to be used in a
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of xc
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498]
I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These
IOS's are resource hogs, so apparently I need
currently running smart brand memory in my 2500 series, 16mb parity simms
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
xc
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498
I have 8 2500's, two 2600's and a 4500M, all with Kingston Flash and DRAM
and I have never had a problem with any of them.
Regards
Adam
-Original Message-
From: xc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 30 April 2001 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: has anybody tried non-Cisco
Tried with all my cisco 2500 seies, found no problem.
xc wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These
IOS's are resource hogs, so apparently I need to pump up the DRAM and
flash.
So, has anybody tried
No problems... I've probably upgraded no less than 25 routers this way.
Just look for 72 pin, 60 nanosecond or better, parity...
That's it !!!
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Chong
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved
8 matches
Mail list logo