source 1.5Mbps at most.
> >
> > Per-packet is far from a gimmick, hence the hardship people are willing to
> > go thru for CEF
> >
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote:
> > >
t; >
> > Brian
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote:
> >
> > > Hi groupies,
> > > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> > > per-packet load-balancing re-as
F
>
> Brian
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote:
>
> > Hi groupies,
> > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> > per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
> > the remote router. Which sequence nu
ies,
> Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
> per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
> the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g
> is it the TCP sequence number.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
> __
Hi groupies,
Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which
per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at
the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g
is it the TCP sequence number.
Regards,
Phil.
Do You Yahoo
5 matches
Mail list logo