Re: per-packet load balancing ?

2000-10-13 Thread Brian
source 1.5Mbps at most. > > > > Per-packet is far from a gimmick, hence the hardship people are willing to > > go thru for CEF > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote: > > >

Re: per-packet load balancing ?

2000-10-13 Thread Brian W.
t; > > > Brian > > > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote: > > > > > Hi groupies, > > > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which > > > per-packet load-balancing re-as

Re: per-packet load balancing ?

2000-10-13 Thread Brian
F > > Brian > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Phil Barker wrote: > > > Hi groupies, > > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which > > per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at > > the remote router. Which sequence nu

Re: per-packet load balancing ?

2000-10-13 Thread Brian W.
ies, > Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which > per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at > the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g > is it the TCP sequence number. > > Regards, > > Phil. > > > > __

per-packet load balancing ?

2000-10-13 Thread Phil Barker
Hi groupies, Can anyone enlighten me on the process by which per-packet load-balancing re-assembles the packets at the remote router. Which sequence number is used e.g is it the TCP sequence number. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo