uck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Craig Columbus
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 6:05 PM
To: Natasha; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: wrong subnet
Hmm...depends on your meaning of correct. The router is the
be good practice, but is only a matter of choice. IT could be anything in
the same subnet.
-Original Message-
From: Natasha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: wrong subnet
It may be legal but still not correct.
One
Looks pretty standard to me as well. Internal private 10.x.x.x with a
class C subnet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christopher Larson
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:04 AM
To: 'Natasha'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wrong subnet
Just write out the address in binary to see if it legal or not.
This address is OK.
Network 10.1.244.0
Host range 10.1.244.1 - 10.1.245.254
Broadcast 10.1.245.255
Mask 255.255.254.0
The router is on the last available address. This is normal in a lot of
networks.
""Dennis Ighomereho"" [EMAIL
: wrong subnet
Looks pretty standard to me as well. Internal private 10.x.x.x with a
class C subnet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christopher Larson
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:04 AM
To: 'Natasha'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
hello everyone,
someone has just given me an IP address to use which i think the subnet is
wrong or know is wrong.can someone just confirm this.
Ip address:10.1.245.253
mask: 255.255.254.0
gateway10.1.245.254
_
Get
Looks legal to me.
--
Eric Fairfield
CCIE #6413
""Dennis Ighomereho"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hello everyone,
someone has just given me an IP address to use which i think the subnet is
wrong or know is wrong.can someone just confirm
It may be legal but still not correct.
One thing that seems a bit odd though, the gateway is generally a
smaller number then the node.
I've never seen it larger but hey I've seen stranger things.
Natasha
just a CCNA lol
Eric Fairfield wrote:
Looks legal to me.
--
Eric Fairfield
CCIE
How is it not correct? The subnet would be 10.1.244.0 with an address range
of 10.1.244.1-10.1.245.254 with a broadcast address of 10.1.245.255.
--
Eric Fairfield
CCIE #6413
"Natasha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It may be legal but still
Hmm...depends on your meaning of correct. The router is the last host IP
in the network (10.1.244.0-10.1.245.255). While most people put the router
as the first IP (in this case 10.1.244.1), there's technically nothing to
prevent someone from making it the last host...or the middle
Absolutely nothing wrong with putting a gateway at the high-end of things.
It's all up to feasibility. Most networks I come across are 192.168.1.0/24
networks with the lower addresses already in use. The next most logical
address to use to me is starting from the last and working backwards.
Ok, Ok UNCLE
lol
We're all still friends right?
True the gateway can be any node but in my limited experience I've
personally haven't seen it any other then the lowest number on the
network.
When I said not correct I meant he may have copied down the wrong
number, I do it all the time!
Friends, well, I guess so!!! Anyhow, it really depends on the IP layout.
If you have multiple routers people sometimes put the first five address in
the range or the last five in the range. I have designed IP networks using
both methods depending on the requirements that the customer has.
--
, .129, etc...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 6:54 PM
To: Craig Columbus; Natasha; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wrong subnet
One place I worked placed all their routers
; Natasha; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: wrong subnet
You know what is crazy about this philosophy...
As a user, I know what the gateway is by looking into my TCP/IP settings.
Oh well.. It's not THAT bad of a idea to change the router to a odd number,
but I think
Hello Dennis,
There is absolutely no issue with having the said IP Address, Netmask and
gateway. The subnet in this particular case is 10.1.244.0, The Valid host
address range is 10.1.244.1 to 10.1.245.254. The broadcast address for this
subnet will be 10.1.245.255.
S.Kalidasan
hello everyone,
;Eric Fairfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 16/01/2001
12:49:25 pm
Please respond to "Eric Fairfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: wrong subnet
How is it not correct? The subnet would be 10.1.244.0 with an address
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: wrong subnet
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:43:42 +1100
I think what Natasha meant is that the address is completely legal, but it
could still be the wrong address to use - if it contradicts the particular
organisation's addressing standards, for example
18 matches
Mail list logo
